From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQvAP-0000y8-K2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:09:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQvA7-0006Vh-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:09:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQvA7-0006Tv-Cd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:08:55 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899B9BDCF for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:08:54 +0000 (UTC) References: <20171218130309.2682-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <167321084.622468.1513602441314.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5de0d539-37f0-5316-918f-9ac46e65aa1e@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:08:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <167321084.622468.1513602441314.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: volatile with a comment or sig_atomic_t is okay List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lersek@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com On 18/12/2017 14:07, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau >> >> This assumes that the comment gives some justification; >> "volatile sig_atomic_t" is also self-explanatory and usually >> correct. >> >> Discussed in: >> '[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dump-guest-memory.py: fix "You can't do that wit= hout a >> process to debug"' >> >> Suggested-by: Fam Zheng >> Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau >> Message-Id: <20171215181810.4122-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >=20 > Thanks, I can add it to my 2 patches series for dump (to avoid error on= Peter's end) >=20 > Unless you send a pull request with it sonnish It is not a big deal if it is included twice. I'm planning my pull request for tomorrow or Wednesday. Paolo >=20 >=20 >> --- >> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++-- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> index 34df753571..3dc27d9656 100755 >> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> @@ -2475,8 +2475,11 @@ sub process { >> =20 >> # no volatiles please >> my $asm_volatile =3D qr{\b(__asm__|asm)\s+(__volatile__|volatile)\b= }; >> - if ($line =3D~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/) { >> - ERROR("Use of volatile is usually wrong: see >> Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt\n" . $herecurr); >> + if ($line =3D~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/ && >> + $line !~ /sig_atomic_t/ && >> + !ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) { >> + my $msg =3D "Use of volatile is usually wrong, please add a commen= t\n" . >> $herecurr; >> + ERROR($msg); >> } >> =20 >> # warn about #if 0 >> -- >> 2.14.3 >> >>