qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	hreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: aio_wait_bh_oneshot() thread-safety question
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 19:56:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5debc575-cc9c-57a8-6dae-48ccee55c83d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a774787e-46ac-36e0-8573-8adc114df784@redhat.com>



Am 24/05/2022 um 09:08 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 5/23/22 18:04, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>
>> I have a doubt about how aio_wait_bh_oneshot() works. Exactly, I see
>> that data->done is not accessed atomically, and doesn't have any
>> barrier protecting it..
>>
>> Is following possible:
>>
>> main-loop                           iothread
>>                                  |
>> aio_wait_bh_oneshot()           |
>>      aio_bh_schedule_oneshot()   |
>>                                  |  handle bh:
>>                                  | 1. set data->done = true
>>                                  | 2. call aio_wait_kick(), inserting the
>>                                  | dummy bh into main context
>>                                  |
>>   ... in AIO_WAIT_WHILE():
>>     handle dummy bh, go to next
>>     iteration, but still read
>>     data->done=false due to some
>>     processor data reordering,
>>     go to next iteration of polling
>>     and hang
> Yes, barriers are missing:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/You6FburTi7gVyxy@stefanha-x1.localdomain/T/#md97146c6eae1fce2ddd687fdc3f2215eee03f6f4
> 
> 
> It seems like the issue was never observed, at least on x86.
> 
> Paolo
> 

Sent the fix as a separate patch:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220524173054.12651-1-eesposit@redhat.com/

Thank you,
Emanuele



      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23 16:04 aio_wait_bh_oneshot() thread-safety question Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-24  7:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-24 12:40   ` Kevin Wolf
2022-05-24 13:46     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-05-24 17:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-24 17:56   ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5debc575-cc9c-57a8-6dae-48ccee55c83d@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).