Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] qapi: block-dirty-bitmap-remove transaction action

[John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>]

On 7/24/19 7:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 15.07.2019 22:48, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/19 6:04 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>> Hi, this is a proposal based off of Vladimir's patchset:
>>> [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qapi: block-dirty-bitmap-remove transaction action
>>>
>>> ===
>>> V3:
>>> ===
>>>
>>> 001/3:[----] [--] 'blockdev: reduce aio_context locked sections in bitmap add/remove'
>>> 002/3:[0024] [FC] 'qapi: implement block-dirty-bitmap-remove transaction action'
>>> 003/3:[----] [--] 'iotests: test bitmap moving inside 254'
>>>
>>> - Changed "squelch_persistence" to "skip_store"
>>> - Use Max's suggestion for return expr
>>>
>>> ===
>>> V2:
>>> ===
>>>
>>> It replaces patches two and three with a modified patch (now patch 2)
>>> that foregoes the need for a hide()/unhide() bitmap API. I think it's
>>> suitable as a smaller alternative, but I'm not sure if it covers all
>>> of the use cases of the original series.
>>>
>>> Patches 1 and 3 (formerly 4) included as-is.
>>>
>>> John Snow (1):
>>>    qapi: implement block-dirty-bitmap-remove transaction action
>>>
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
>>>    blockdev: reduce aio_context locked sections in bitmap add/remove
>>>    iotests: test bitmap moving inside 254
>>>
>>>   block.c                        |   2 +-
>>>   block/dirty-bitmap.c           |  15 +++--
>>>   blockdev.c                     | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>   include/block/dirty-bitmap.h   |   2 +-
>>>   migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c |   2 +-
>>>   qapi/transaction.json          |   2 +
>>>   tests/qemu-iotests/254         |  30 +++++++++-
>>>   tests/qemu-iotests/254.out     |  82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   8 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, applied to my bitmaps tree:
>>
>> https://github.com/jnsnow/qemu/commits/bitmaps
>> https://github.com/jnsnow/qemu.git
>>
>> --js
>>
>>
>> (Vladimir: if this isn't amenable to you, it's going in for 4.2, so we
>> have until the next freeze to change it. Let me know, OK?)
>>
> 
> 
> And finally I'm here :)
> 
> Thanks a lot for doing this job and for your explanations in other threads which
> I'm reading today and sorry for the delay! I'll look through these series soon.
> 
> Actually, my second child (girl:) was born a month ago, and then her elder brother
> was ill, so I took two weeks sick leave after about two weeks vacation and forget
> about work for a month.
> 
> Hmm. And Nikolay, who doing libvirt part is on vocation now (I started bitmap remove
> transaction series by his request), so I don't know about the end of the story with
> release and this functionality..
> 
> Anyway, it's cool, thanks!
> 

Wow!

Congratulations Vladimir!