From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
berrange@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Cc: arei.gonglei@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] sem-posix: use monotonic clock instead
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:42:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e92a220-eb61-c510-0cdc-bf418b9025bc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221095617.1974-3-longpeng2@huawei.com>
On 2/21/22 10:56, Longpeng(Mike) via wrote:
> + long now_nsec;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PTHREAD_CONDATTR_SETCLOCK
> + struct timespec now;
> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now);
> + now_sec = now.tv_sec;
> + now_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
> +#else
> struct timeval tv;
> gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> - ts->tv_nsec = tv.tv_usec * 1000 + (ms % 1000) * 1000000;
> - ts->tv_sec = tv.tv_sec + ms / 1000;
> + now_sec = tv.tv_sec;
> + now_nsec = tv.tv_usec * 1000;
> +#endif
> +
Perhaps this might minimize the amount of conditional code, too:
diff --git a/util/qemu-thread-posix.c b/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
index 903fa33965..4743d7b714 100644
--- a/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
+++ b/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
@@ -40,10 +40,14 @@ static void error_exit(int err, const char *msg)
static void compute_abs_deadline(struct timespec *ts, int ms)
{
- struct timeval tv;
- gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
- ts->tv_nsec = tv.tv_usec * 1000 + (ms % 1000) * 1000000;
- ts->tv_sec = tv.tv_sec + ms / 1000;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PTHREAD_CONDATTR_SETCLOCK
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts);
+#else
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, ts);
+#endif
+
+ ts->tv_nsec += (ms % 1000) * 1000000;
+ ts->tv_sec += ms / 1000;
if (ts->tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
ts->tv_sec++;
ts->tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
Finally, the conditional variables initialization qemu_cond_init must
also use pthread_condattr_setclock.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 9:56 [RFC 0/2] qemu-sem-posix: use monotonic clock instead Longpeng(Mike) via
2022-02-21 9:56 ` [RFC 1/2] sem-posix: remove the posix semaphore support Longpeng(Mike) via
2022-02-21 11:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-21 14:35 ` longpeng2--- via
2022-02-23 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 9:56 ` [RFC 2/2] sem-posix: use monotonic clock instead Longpeng(Mike) via
2022-02-21 11:42 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-02-21 14:39 ` longpeng2--- via
2022-02-21 11:31 ` [RFC 0/2] qemu-sem-posix: " Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-21 14:37 ` longpeng2--- via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e92a220-eb61-c510-0cdc-bf418b9025bc@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).