qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Peng, Chao P" <chao.p.peng@intel.com>,
	Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:17:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5eb6c665-df8f-4c5e-8426-4678d8433a0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB67443BF6BC7CABCE28F482A392082@SJ0PR11MB6744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hello,

On 4/16/24 09:09, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do
>> compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap
>>
>> On 4/8/24 10:44, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>>
>>> If check fails, the host side device(either vfio or vdpa device) should not
>>> be passed to guest.
>>>
>>> Implementation details for different backends will be in following patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 35
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> index 4f84e2e801..a49b587c73 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>>>    #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>>>    #include "sysemu/dma.h"
>>>    #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>> +#include "sysemu/iommufd.h"
>>>    #include "hw/i386/apic_internal.h"
>>>    #include "kvm/kvm_i386.h"
>>>    #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>>> @@ -3819,6 +3820,32 @@ VTDAddressSpace
>> *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState *s, PCIBus *bus,
>>>        return vtd_dev_as;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static int vtd_check_legacy_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> +                                 HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>>> +                                 Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> +                                  HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>>> +                                  Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int vtd_check_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDHostIOMMUDevice
>> *vtd_hdev,
>>> +                          Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = vtd_hdev->dev;
>>> +
>>> +    if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(hiod), TYPE_HIOD_IOMMUFD)) {
>>> +        return vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(s, hiod, errp);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return vtd_check_legacy_hdev(s, hiod, errp);
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> I think we should be using the .get_host_iommu_info() class handler
>> instead. Can we refactor the code slightly to avoid this check on
>> the type ?
> 
> There is some difficulty ini avoiding this check, the behavior of vtd_check_legacy_hdev
> and vtd_check_iommufd_hdev are different especially after nesting support introduced.
> vtd_check_iommufd_hdev() has much wider check over cap/ecap bits besides aw_bits.

I think it is important to fully separate the vIOMMU model from the
host IOMMU backing device. Could we introduce a new HostIOMMUDeviceClass
handler .check_hdev() handler, which would call .get_host_iommu_info() ?


Thanks,

C.


> That the reason I have two functions to do different thing.
> See:
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/blob/zhenzhong/iommufd_nesting_rfcv2/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c#L5472
> 
> Meanwhile in vtd_check_legacy_hdev(), when legacy VFIO device attaches to modern vIOMMU,
> this is unsupported and error out early, it will not call .get_host_iommu_info().
> I mean we don't need to unconditionally call .get_host_iommu_info() in some cases.
> 
> Thanks
> Zhenzhong



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08  8:43 [PATCH v2 0/5] Check host IOMMU compatilibity with vIOMMU Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] intel_iommu: Extract out vtd_cap_init() to initialize cap/ecap Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] intel_iommu: Implement set/unset_iommu_device() callback Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-15 15:31   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  7:09     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-16 14:17       ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-04-17  4:21         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-17  8:30           ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-17  9:24             ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-18  6:42               ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-18  8:42                 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-19  6:20                   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-19  9:49                     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-25  8:46                     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-25 12:40                       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-26  3:10                         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-06-02 12:56                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-03  6:25                             ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with legacy device Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with iommufd backed device Zhenzhong Duan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5eb6c665-df8f-4c5e-8426-4678d8433a0c@redhat.com \
    --to=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).