From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Peng, Chao P" <chao.p.peng@intel.com>,
Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:17:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5eb6c665-df8f-4c5e-8426-4678d8433a0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB67443BF6BC7CABCE28F482A392082@SJ0PR11MB6744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hello,
On 4/16/24 09:09, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do
>> compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap
>>
>> On 4/8/24 10:44, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>>
>>> If check fails, the host side device(either vfio or vdpa device) should not
>>> be passed to guest.
>>>
>>> Implementation details for different backends will be in following patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 35
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> index 4f84e2e801..a49b587c73 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>>> #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>>> #include "sysemu/dma.h"
>>> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>> +#include "sysemu/iommufd.h"
>>> #include "hw/i386/apic_internal.h"
>>> #include "kvm/kvm_i386.h"
>>> #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>>> @@ -3819,6 +3820,32 @@ VTDAddressSpace
>> *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState *s, PCIBus *bus,
>>> return vtd_dev_as;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int vtd_check_legacy_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>>> + Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>>> + Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int vtd_check_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDHostIOMMUDevice
>> *vtd_hdev,
>>> + Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod = vtd_hdev->dev;
>>> +
>>> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(hiod), TYPE_HIOD_IOMMUFD)) {
>>> + return vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(s, hiod, errp);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return vtd_check_legacy_hdev(s, hiod, errp);
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> I think we should be using the .get_host_iommu_info() class handler
>> instead. Can we refactor the code slightly to avoid this check on
>> the type ?
>
> There is some difficulty ini avoiding this check, the behavior of vtd_check_legacy_hdev
> and vtd_check_iommufd_hdev are different especially after nesting support introduced.
> vtd_check_iommufd_hdev() has much wider check over cap/ecap bits besides aw_bits.
I think it is important to fully separate the vIOMMU model from the
host IOMMU backing device. Could we introduce a new HostIOMMUDeviceClass
handler .check_hdev() handler, which would call .get_host_iommu_info() ?
Thanks,
C.
> That the reason I have two functions to do different thing.
> See:
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/blob/zhenzhong/iommufd_nesting_rfcv2/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c#L5472
>
> Meanwhile in vtd_check_legacy_hdev(), when legacy VFIO device attaches to modern vIOMMU,
> this is unsupported and error out early, it will not call .get_host_iommu_info().
> I mean we don't need to unconditionally call .get_host_iommu_info() in some cases.
>
> Thanks
> Zhenzhong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/5] Check host IOMMU compatilibity with vIOMMU Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] intel_iommu: Extract out vtd_cap_init() to initialize cap/ecap Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] intel_iommu: Implement set/unset_iommu_device() callback Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_iommu: Add a framework to do compatibility check with host IOMMU cap/ecap Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-15 15:31 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16 7:09 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-16 14:17 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-04-17 4:21 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-17 8:30 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-17 9:24 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-18 6:42 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-18 8:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-19 6:20 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-19 9:49 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-25 8:46 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-25 12:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-26 3:10 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-06-02 12:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-03 6:25 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with legacy device Zhenzhong Duan
2024-04-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with iommufd backed device Zhenzhong Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5eb6c665-df8f-4c5e-8426-4678d8433a0c@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).