From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
svens@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com,
rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:43:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ed5bc04-e4e3-21ca-057f-a978ef411ad8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512180140.4be69d60.cohuck@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2016 bytes --]
On 5/12/20 6:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 17:02:06 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11.05.20 16:50, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> On 5/11/20 4:44 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 11.05.20 16:36, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>>>> On 5/9/20 1:08 AM, Collin Walling wrote:
>>>>>> The SCCB must be checked for a sufficient length before it is filled
>>>>>> with any data. If the length is insufficient, then the SCLP command
>>>>>> is suppressed and the proper response code is set in the SCCB header.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes tag?
>
> Probably
>
> Fixes: 832be0d8a3bb ("s390x: sclp: Report insufficient SCCB length")
>
> ?
>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is not a fix AFAIKs.
>>>> sclp_service_call()/sclp_service_call_protected() always supplies a full
>>>> SCCB of exactly 4k size.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We don't check for QEMU's 4k buffer here, but for the length that was
>>> specified by the guest.
>>>
>>> It's valid for the guest to request cpu info and state that its buffer
>>> is only 1k. We can't write everything in 1k if we have ~200 cpus, so
>>> we'll report the insufficient length rc.
>>>
>>> What he fixes here is the time of the length check, it should be done
>>> before any changes are being done to the work_sccb.
>>
>> I don't have access to the spec, especially, if the guest can expect
>> nothing else in the sccb to change in case we report an error code. So
>> whatever you tell me, I have to trust you :)
>
> Same here. Sounds plausible, but I have to trust the folks with the
> documentation :)
>
The AR states that:
* Command validity check (has prio over length, as length is dependent
on command)
* boundary (if extended-length is not available)
* Sufficient length check
are done before "any other command action is taken".
If a test fails the command is suppressed.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 23:08 [PATCH v1 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] s390/sclp: remove SCLPDevice param from prepare_cpu_entries Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:37 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-12 7:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:36 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-11 14:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-11 14:47 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:50 ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-11 15:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 16:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:16 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-12 16:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:25 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-13 7:43 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-05-13 8:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-14 17:22 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 11:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks Collin Walling
2020-05-12 7:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 14:55 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-13 7:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-14 17:23 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on sccb length Collin Walling
2020-05-12 7:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 14:46 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-05-13 7:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-13 22:44 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] s390: diagnose 318 info reset and migration support Collin Walling
2020-05-09 8:07 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 no-reply
2020-05-12 16:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:20 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ed5bc04-e4e3-21ca-057f-a978ef411ad8@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).