From: "Marco Cavenati" <Marco.Cavenati@eurecom.fr>
To: "Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: add FEATURE_SEEKABLE to QIOChannelBlock
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:05:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ef-67efcb00-537-1a6bb1a0@222476586> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8KmOzz2cyHimBXcs79wOOzg2KyKwmSNSXbkJomhGdhwWfKBg@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, April 04, 2025 12:14 CEST, Prasad Pandit <ppandit@redhat.com> wrote:
> * If the r/w pointer adjustment (lseek(2)) is not required, then why
> set the '*_FEATURE_SEEKABLE' flag?
The QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SEEKABLE flag is set to indicate that
the channel supports seekable operations. This flag is more about
signaling capability rather than dictating the use of the specific
lseek(2) function.
> * The qio_channel_block_preadv/pwritev functions defined above, which
> shall be called via '->io_preadv' and '->io_pwritev' methods, appear
> to call bdrv_readv/writev_vmstate() functions. Do those functions need
> to adjust (lseek(2)) the stream r/w pointers?
In this case, I don't think any lseek(2) is involved, instead some flavor
of pread(2) is used, which, according to the man page, requires that
> The file referenced by fd must be capable of seeking.
because pread(2) internally manages seeking without modifying the
file descriptor's offset.
Let me split the question here:
* Do those functions need to seek into the channel?
Yes
* Do those functions lseek(2) the stream r/w pointers?
No, they do not use lseek(2). The seeking is managed internally by the
pread(2) and co. functions, which perform I/O operations at
specified offsets without altering the file descriptor's position.
I hope this clarifies :)
Best,
Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 14:14 [PATCH] migration: add FEATURE_SEEKABLE to QIOChannelBlock Marco Cavenati
2025-04-04 8:19 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-04 9:04 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-04 10:14 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-04 12:05 ` Marco Cavenati [this message]
2025-04-07 6:47 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-07 9:00 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-08 5:25 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-08 15:03 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-15 10:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-15 10:44 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-15 11:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-15 11:57 ` Prasad Pandit
2025-04-15 12:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-10 19:52 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 8:48 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-11 12:24 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-15 10:15 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-15 13:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-17 9:10 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-04-17 15:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-24 13:44 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-05-08 20:23 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-09 12:51 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-05-09 16:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-09 21:14 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-05-09 22:04 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-16 16:06 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-09-19 21:24 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-22 15:51 ` Marco Cavenati
2025-09-30 20:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ef-67efcb00-537-1a6bb1a0@222476586 \
--to=marco.cavenati@eurecom.fr \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).