qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, eduardo@habkost.net,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, philmd@linaro.org,
	wangyanan55@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/22] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:50:07 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f25d9cf-3ca0-4adb-860e-71a8fac3b504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221130823.677762-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On 2/21/24 03:08, Jinjie Ruan via wrote:
> The ALLINT bit in PSTATE is used to mask all IRQ or FIQ interrupts.
> 
> Place this in its own field within ENV, as that will
> make it easier to reset from within TCG generated code.
> 
> With the change to pstate_read/write, exception entry
> and return are automatically handled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
>   target/arm/cpu.c | 3 +++
>   target/arm/cpu.h | 9 +++++++--
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index 5fa86bc8d5..5e5978c302 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,9 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cs, FILE *f, int flags)
>       if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_bti, cpu)) {
>           qemu_fprintf(f, "  BTYPE=%d", (psr & PSTATE_BTYPE) >> 10);
>       }
> +    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
> +        qemu_fprintf(f, "  ALLINT=%d", (psr & PSTATE_ALLINT) >> 13);
> +    }

This is one bit -- !!(psr & ALLINT) is better

We don't individually print DAIF either; why is this bit more special?

> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState {
>        *    semantics as for AArch32, as described in the comments on each field)
>        *  nRW (also known as M[4]) is kept, inverted, in env->aarch64
>        *  DAIF (exception masks) are kept in env->daif
> +     *  ALLINT (all IRQ or FIQ interrupts masks) are kept in env->allint
>        *  BTYPE is kept in env->btype
>        *  SM and ZA are kept in env->svcr
>        *  all other bits are stored in their correct places in env->pstate
> @@ -261,6 +262,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState {
>       uint32_t btype;  /* BTI branch type.  spsr[11:10].  */
>       uint64_t daif; /* exception masks, in the bits they are in PSTATE */
>       uint64_t svcr; /* PSTATE.{SM,ZA} in the bits they are in SVCR */
> +    uint64_t allint; /* All IRQ or FIQ interrupt mask, in the bit in PSTATE */

Why is this split out from env->pstate?

The allint bit matches the documentation for SPSR_EL1, which is how env->pstate is 
documented.  The other exclusions have some performance imperative which I don't see for 
allint.


r~


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 13:08 [RFC PATCH v2 00/22] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/22] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:22   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  1:52     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/22] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 18:28   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/22] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 18:50   ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2024-02-22  1:48     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-22 19:25       ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/22] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate) Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 19:09   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 19:17     ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 20:41     ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  2:40       ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-22 19:42       ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  2:34     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/22] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 19:28   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  3:50     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/22] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:06   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  2:44     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-22  9:27     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:23   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22  9:26     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/22] target/arm: Add support for NMI event state Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:10   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 21:25     ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22 11:52       ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-22 18:38         ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/22] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:36   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22 12:34     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/22] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:16   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/22] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:36   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/22] target/arm: Set pstate.ALLINT in arm_cpu_reset_hold Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:43   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-22 12:48     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/22] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI irq line from GIC to CPU Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/22] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 20:48   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:44   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/22] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/22] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:47   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq superpriority information Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 21:48   ` Richard Henderson
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty Jinjie Ruan via
2024-02-21 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Jinjie Ruan via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f25d9cf-3ca0-4adb-860e-71a8fac3b504@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).