From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3B2C432C3 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4BE20733 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4F4BE20733 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdLR-0005bP-Es for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:17:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdKL-0004X9-7C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdKH-0002SX-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:16:01 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33066 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVdKH-0002S7-Jd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:15:57 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAFF4cjo097835 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:15:55 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w9nsmmb2h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:15:55 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:53 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:50 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xAFFFnbd46989374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:49 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDFB4C05A; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B62F4C07A; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3016276355.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.171.60]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390x: kvm-unit-tests: a PONG device for Sub Channels tests To: Cornelia Huck References: <1573671753-15115-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20191114113823.5d752648.cohuck@redhat.com> <20191114140235.30a788d6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20191114141915.6dd5b9c8.cohuck@redhat.com> <2c10ed4f-2b9e-89e7-0e3e-704355523239@linux.ibm.com> <20191115113512.2b9be20e.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:15:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191115113512.2b9be20e.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19111515-4275-0000-0000-0000037E0EF6 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19111515-4276-0000-0000-000038917952 Message-Id: <5f702d5b-17f5-8c24-f80b-c1525a370de1@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-15_04:2019-11-15,2019-11-15 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911150138 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.163.158.5 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2019-11-15 11:35, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:42:35 +0100 > Pierre Morel wrote: > >> On 2019-11-14 14:19, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:02:35 +0100 >>> Halil Pasic wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:38:23 +0100 >>>> Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:02:33 +0100 >>>>> Pierre Morel wrote: >>>>> >> ...snip... >>>> We made some different design decisions, while aiming essentially for the >>>> same. Maybe it's due to different scope, maybe not. For instance one >>>> can't test IDA with PONG, I guess. >>> Now that I saw this again, I also recall the discussion of comparing it >>> with the "testdev" for pci/isa. Anybody knows if these are used by >>> kvm-unit-tests? >> Only by X. > If they use it, it might make sense for s390 to use a comparable > approach. yes it does. > > Btw, I created https://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/CCWTestDevice back then; > might make sense to collect ideas there? right, I forgot this too. OK, will use it :) Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen