From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAC3C433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27AD1206C3 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="BaxQDpDY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 27AD1206C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54Du-0003zC-ES for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:36:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54DK-0003Xc-Ts for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:46615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54DJ-0001LE-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597052127; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=InZJxLRtX7Ix9veEpC7hkhws4Ig34VNa7tlBRAp8UpE=; b=BaxQDpDYGXJ8NpDRNsDOS09O1zD51yNA0fJA0aotXoI4UN3uG6b8KtKRs6biUouNlWnqSu nWXtk4s/d0jqTf6kfde0v/iIVeCPCW58iMlOGfubPoXyewrXZns0g/OB+FYy/9jfjtgfU7 QS23Yc6WlZe7uHtCSboJRZouKagESKI= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-420-gfA7OCouPLWjp5lT4LPxyw-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gfA7OCouPLWjp5lT4LPxyw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id p23so2563964wmc.2 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=InZJxLRtX7Ix9veEpC7hkhws4Ig34VNa7tlBRAp8UpE=; b=bi+ZPwEmG+LYza16H69DtxKSTOZsmedGiZeiVQO7CTiEUOl/62EMGPRkr3I8Qvms7v Vw9wCLYRMchUnNgo2zdXBvXFIDmNQKwNcKMefa/uiIgJVzHs3Wpr6lYpF1vS6aQXrGKF WKIUJXZv5ZgRG1EAFTGaTmhQmEjhqMVQ1iM5onuJZQODzpQSbtXWuC59j7uQ3Z5Z8/L+ nsItn8FwA+3GylkMg0jalfjvIPcOaJ3x/TKVLcOJBAx3XdeXulivxFYKdmu10fOt2zVo QPyzRZNTrO8zBDiOoRTDZSuhkB3jv7ZrxRHKiLos1TcWNTH1dZhdMo6EVC4pl3Fbpqfn OtGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AuUw2A5znaXdWnvKu83UI5ceYYH9jkTZ7V9sWxUN1IuVGXZqc GbcYwBdazkJ33VIMMEVLYiZAipbtq62GRxGXKZZGCZwMpjB7x3QGvhIEJ1vn/w1z85uPanDj54w DR+nSmBzxVg224sk= X-Received: by 2002:adf:8445:: with SMTP id 63mr552429wrf.375.1597052124601; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:35:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyY4Dv3EelZRJ4b4y29W4n9zjYbEJzLe3DLdkPo6Fm7qkpQLiWBL1dh/3hdDxFlodGwic1H7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8445:: with SMTP id 63mr552413wrf.375.1597052124395; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (121.red-81-40-121.staticip.rima-tde.net. [81.40.121.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g70sm21328611wmg.24.2020.08.10.02.35.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] acceptance: update asset hashes for the Bionic aarch64 installer To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200809223741.56570-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <13b3586c-4d0e-76bc-4716-b6ee88e9686a@redhat.com> <06ed9cc7-2204-395c-2395-d5c750c75635@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Autocrypt: addr=philmd@redhat.com; keydata= mQINBDXML8YBEADXCtUkDBKQvNsQA7sDpw6YLE/1tKHwm24A1au9Hfy/OFmkpzo+MD+dYc+7 bvnqWAeGweq2SDq8zbzFZ1gJBd6+e5v1a/UrTxvwBk51yEkadrpRbi+r2bDpTJwXc/uEtYAB GvsTZMtiQVA4kRID1KCdgLa3zztPLCj5H1VZhqZsiGvXa/nMIlhvacRXdbgllPPJ72cLUkXf z1Zu4AkEKpccZaJspmLWGSzGu6UTZ7UfVeR2Hcc2KI9oZB1qthmZ1+PZyGZ/Dy+z+zklC0xl XIpQPmnfy9+/1hj1LzJ+pe3HzEodtlVA+rdttSvA6nmHKIt8Ul6b/h1DFTmUT1lN1WbAGxmg CH1O26cz5nTrzdjoqC/b8PpZiT0kO5MKKgiu5S4PRIxW2+RA4H9nq7nztNZ1Y39bDpzwE5Sp bDHzd5owmLxMLZAINtCtQuRbSOcMjZlg4zohA9TQP9krGIk+qTR+H4CV22sWldSkVtsoTaA2 qNeSJhfHQY0TyQvFbqRsSNIe2gTDzzEQ8itsmdHHE/yzhcCVvlUzXhAT6pIN0OT+cdsTTfif MIcDboys92auTuJ7U+4jWF1+WUaJ8gDL69ThAsu7mGDBbm80P3vvUZ4fQM14NkxOnuGRrJxO qjWNJ2ZUxgyHAh5TCxMLKWZoL5hpnvx3dF3Ti9HW2dsUUWICSQARAQABtDJQaGlsaXBwZSBN YXRoaWV1LURhdWTDqSAoUGhpbCkgPHBoaWxtZEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokCVQQTAQgAPwIbDwYL CQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQSJweePYB7obIZ0lcuio/1u3q3A3gUCXsfWwAUJ KtymWgAKCRCio/1u3q3A3ircD/9Vjh3aFNJ3uF3hddeoFg1H038wZr/xi8/rX27M1Vj2j9VH 0B8Olp4KUQw/hyO6kUxqkoojmzRpmzvlpZ0cUiZJo2bQIWnvScyHxFCv33kHe+YEIqoJlaQc JfKYlbCoubz+02E2A6bFD9+BvCY0LBbEj5POwyKGiDMjHKCGuzSuDRbCn0Mz4kCa7nFMF5Jv piC+JemRdiBd6102ThqgIsyGEBXuf1sy0QIVyXgaqr9O2b/0VoXpQId7yY7OJuYYxs7kQoXI 6WzSMpmuXGkmfxOgbc/L6YbzB0JOriX0iRClxu4dEUg8Bs2pNnr6huY2Ft+qb41RzCJvvMyu gS32LfN0bTZ6Qm2A8ayMtUQgnwZDSO23OKgQWZVglGliY3ezHZ6lVwC24Vjkmq/2yBSLakZE 6DZUjZzCW1nvtRK05ebyK6tofRsx8xB8pL/kcBb9nCuh70aLR+5cmE41X4O+MVJbwfP5s/RW 9BFSL3qgXuXso/3XuWTQjJJGgKhB6xXjMmb1J4q/h5IuVV4juv1Fem9sfmyrh+Wi5V1IzKI7 RPJ3KVb937eBgSENk53P0gUorwzUcO+ASEo3Z1cBKkJSPigDbeEjVfXQMzNt0oDRzpQqH2vp apo2jHnidWt8BsckuWZpxcZ9+/9obQ55DyVQHGiTN39hkETy3Emdnz1JVHTU0Q== Message-ID: <606d1faa-1920-de51-9197-95b79466331d@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:35:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06ed9cc7-2204-395c-2395-d5c750c75635@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/10 05:35:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , alex.bennee@linaro.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 8/10/20 11:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/08/20 11:06, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> The 'bug' is this link is using "current" which will be a problem each >> time Ubuntu update the installer (latest update was last Wed, Aug 5). >> >> Acceptance tests should be stick to a particular set of binary, knew to >> have worked once in the past. If a new set works, I'd rather see a new >> test added (because it might have a different QEMU coverage). > > That seems overkill but yeah the tests should have used > 20101020ubuntu543.15 instead of current. I think this should get into rc4. As our CI is not yet gating, I don't think this justifies delaying the release (except if there is a critical bugfix on the list). Maybe it is acceptable to simply merge the CI test fixes before the release tag, as no code/binary is affected... > > Paolo >