qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Turner <digit@google.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:31:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60cad3f0902031631k680ac731u92f8d3ae1c853e25@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0902031335t71922b13ne2a22baa38318698@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1231 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Laurent Desnogues <
laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> For instance someone (Andzrej?) mentionned  ARM in system mode is half
> slower than it was before TCG.  Also the ARM target needs some fixing.
>

I have integrated the TCG ARM backend in the Android emulator, and my
measurements
show an improvement in performance, when running various Android performance
tests,
between x1.10 and x1.90 compared to the old dyngen based translator. To be
honest,
the improvements are not consistent, there are a few rare tests
that run at x0.89, but they're not critical to me).

Note that the TCG binary is compiled with GCC 4.2, while the old one was
built with
GCC 3.3 (fo rthe usual ugly dyngen reasons).

This is only when comparing the same ARMv5 binaries, but it sounds good
enough for me.

An official release would be very welcomed at this point. The amount of
changes since
the last one has been dramatic. Morever, this will allow everyone to reset
the clock on
their forks and more easily share patches with upstream.

Just my 2 cents


>
> Perhaps doing at least one release candidate to get feedback (and focus on
> fixing reported bugs) would be appropriate.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Laurent
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1796 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-03 20:48 [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 20:58 ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-03 21:35   ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-02-03 21:50     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 22:05       ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-02-03 22:47         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 23:48           ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-04 13:09       ` Ulrich Hecht
2009-02-04  0:31     ` David Turner [this message]
     [not found]     ` <74222928-D24B-4780-BDB0-D537A83C4F68@hotmail.com>
2009-02-04  5:08       ` C.W. Betts
2009-02-03 21:48 ` Rick Vernam
2009-02-03 22:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-02-04 14:50 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-02-04 15:23   ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 15:43     ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-02-04 16:01       ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 18:17         ` [Qemu-devel] " Consul
2009-02-04 17:39   ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2009-02-04 17:50     ` Jonathan Kalbfeld
2009-02-04 20:07   ` Blue Swirl
2009-02-07 14:15   ` Stuart Brady
2009-02-04 15:58 ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-07 15:29 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-02-11 21:49   ` Rob Landley
2009-02-12 14:44     ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-02-12 21:08       ` Rob Landley
2009-02-12 21:44       ` Rob Landley
2009-02-09 12:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-02-09 21:36   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-10  0:47   ` Rob Landley
2009-02-10  7:22     ` M. Warner Losh
2009-02-13  8:40 ` Riku Voipio
2009-02-13  9:59   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-02-13 16:30   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-13 17:00     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-13 19:04       ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports Jamie Lokier
2009-02-14 22:23         ` Dor Laor
2009-02-15  2:20           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-14 23:13         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15  2:01           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-15  4:09             ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15 15:42               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-15 18:19                 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15 18:34                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16  1:01                     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-17  0:52                       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-17  2:55                         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-16  1:19                     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-17  1:01                   ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60cad3f0902031631k680ac731u92f8d3ae1c853e25@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=digit@google.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).