From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 0/9] risu: refactor and reduce CPU-specific code
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:15:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <619a06f3-1b9a-ba3e-2469-76e57bf838f0@vivier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487957728-8354-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Le 24/02/2017 à 18:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> This patchset refactors the risu C code to reduce the significant
> amount of duplicated and duplicated-but-not-quite-the-same code
> in the per-CPU files.
>
> I've compile tested this for all architectures, but I'm not in a
> position to do runtime tests for non-ARM (my attempt to use the
> ppc64le risu under QEMU gives mismatch errors even without these
> patches, and the m68k risu makes QEMU crash, presumably because our
> m68k support isn't complete yet). So I wasn't quite prepared to just
Yes, the FPU part is missing.
> push it straight out to master the way I've done with previous
> changes I've been making.
>
> Nikunj, Laurent: if you have time to test this patchset to confirm
> that it hasn't broken anything for you that would be great.
for m68k
Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
>
> My motivation for all this, incidentally, is that I wanted to have
> a go at resurrecting the x86 backend as a test case for how we
> should support variable-length instruction sets.
I think m68k is needing that too.
Thanks,
Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-24 17:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 0/9] risu: refactor and reduce CPU-specific code Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 1/9] Drop the weird modification of a ucontext in the ppc reginfo_is_eq() Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 2/9] Abstract out getting and setting parameter register Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 3/9] Make get_risuop() a formal part of the CPU interface Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 4/9] ppc64le, m68k: Make reginfo_dump() API match arm, aarch64 Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 5/9] m68k: Drop unused ucontext_t* argument to reginfo_is_eq() Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 6/9] Make reginfo_{init, is_eq, dump, dump_mismatch} official per-CPU API Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 7/9] Move send_register_info() to reginfo.c Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 8/9] Move recv_and_compare_register_info() and report_match_status() " Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 17:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 9/9] Tidy up #include lines Peter Maydell
2017-02-24 18:15 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2017-02-24 18:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH risu 0/9] risu: refactor and reduce CPU-specific code Peter Maydell
2017-02-28 17:47 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=619a06f3-1b9a-ba3e-2469-76e57bf838f0@vivier.eu \
--to=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).