From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Harsh Prateek Bora" <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] cpus: Remove cpu from global queue after UNREALIZE completed
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:08:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61b6b085-cc5e-4439-8af0-e51f45207a03@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128142152.9889-4-philmd@linaro.org>
On 1/28/25 06:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Previous commit removed the restriction on completing the full QDev
> UNREALIZE step before removing vCPUs from global queue, it is now
> safe to call cpu_list_remove() after accel_cpu_common_unrealize().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> cpu-target.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu-target.c b/cpu-target.c
> index 667688332c9..11592e2583f 100644
> --- a/cpu-target.c
> +++ b/cpu-target.c
> @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ void cpu_exec_unrealizefn(CPUState *cpu)
> }
> #endif
>
> - cpu_list_remove(cpu);
> - /*
> - * Now that the vCPU has been removed from the RCU list, we can call
> - * accel_cpu_common_unrealize, which may free fields using call_rcu.
> - */
> accel_cpu_common_unrealize(cpu);
> +
> + cpu_list_remove(cpu);
> }
I don't believe this is correct. Why would we have an unrealized cpu on the list? What's
wrong with removing the cpu from the list before unrealize?
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 14:21 [RFC PATCH 0/9] accel: Only include qdev-realized vCPUs in global &cpus_queue Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] accel/tcg: Simplify use of &first_cpu in rr_cpu_thread_fn() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 19:44 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] accel/tcg: Invalidate TB jump cache with global vCPU queue locked Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:05 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] cpus: Remove cpu from global queue after UNREALIZE completed Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:08 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] hw/qdev: Introduce DeviceClass::[un]wire() handlers Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:52 ` Richard Henderson
2025-02-04 13:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] cpus: Add DeviceClass::[un]wire() stubs Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:53 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] cpus: Call hotplug handlers in DeviceWire() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:53 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] cpus: Only expose REALIZED vCPUs to global &cpus_queue Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:53 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 20:55 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] accel/kvm: Assert vCPU is created when calling kvm_dirty_ring_reap*() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:57 ` Richard Henderson
2025-01-28 14:21 ` [PATCH 9/9] accel/kvm: Remove unreachable assertion in kvm_dirty_ring_reap*() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-28 20:58 ` Richard Henderson
2025-02-07 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] accel: Only include qdev-realized vCPUs in global &cpus_queue Igor Mammedov
2025-02-09 18:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61b6b085-cc5e-4439-8af0-e51f45207a03@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).