From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Ashijeet Acharya <ashijeetacharya@gmail.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, jcody@redhat.com,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:41:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61e334e1-bfe5-7907-cad1-a490ec10f8da@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC2QTZYoySpD+fVkk0gaaJy36D+3=DoYiYNLAj5Yum4pcAJXhw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>>
>>> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
>>> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several
>>> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri syntax for NFS in
>>> QEMU looks like this:
>>>
>>> nfs://<host>/<export>/<filename>[?param=value[¶m2=value2[&...]]]
>> It's actually nfs://<host>[:port]/...
>>
>> so the URI syntax already supports port.
> But the commit message which added support for NFS had the uri which I
> mentioned above and the code for NFS does not make use of 'port'
> anywhere either, which is why I am a bit confused.
Hi Aschijeet,
don't worry there is no port number when connecting to an NFS server.
The portmapper always listens on port 111. So theoretically we could
specifiy a port in the URL but it is ignored.
BR,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 5:09 [Qemu-devel] block/nfs: Fine grained runtime options in nfs Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-14 15:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-10-17 18:00 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-17 19:29 ` Eric Blake
2016-10-17 19:34 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-18 10:41 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2016-10-18 12:46 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-18 13:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-10-18 13:14 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-18 13:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-10-18 13:49 ` Eric Blake
2016-10-18 16:13 ` Ashijeet Acharya
2016-10-18 16:18 ` Ashijeet Acharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61e334e1-bfe5-7907-cad1-a490ec10f8da@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=ashijeetacharya@gmail.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).