From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF20C4363A for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F421206D4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="HPuBMkgx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F421206D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXUI2-00007W-4b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:05:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXU1s-0003GL-6F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:49:09 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:57430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXU1q-0006fC-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:49:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603824544; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=isf6733Qk0Rl/B/21TvcSsL9gaZ2dMHhY9xDzcDNmMk=; b=HPuBMkgxvGnUoTgqrFb8wQuhPPNRgy+R8i1YWeroh1zKv9hzWcwLaJvqM36+rVoOjukTZl KGEJamSTDPczTPx+VUxbyQcOmdUQFu/55C7ivmfV4ou6QVCGYLlDgl8kKz+KN33i9xNb8k x2Sp06Yul+YC97FBTcVMLPHkgt4vvmI= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-94-2RnkVlbJNRS_8kgmXqfT7Q-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:49:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2RnkVlbJNRS_8kgmXqfT7Q-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id j13so756642wrn.4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:49:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=isf6733Qk0Rl/B/21TvcSsL9gaZ2dMHhY9xDzcDNmMk=; b=UP9X9K1jW3UYLDjKZomINW1ECU9+dtu5MGOABjCLiCBdclI2UGcC8s6MV4Yxq2B7Mj 1xoiAw9wYC/FQV7T8JwLFJ3thWcltzvvYtxPsGUOJUs+22wvn+cKBflWGrMNv26owdQH Y+ZOZZnr7tuxlFgQNzOfnajbJH4Z1Ciui3tZrg6zAkdrl9ZxXxHz5AkT080izBmqUfsi VcnXOz/fIm0C5xKREczJ8CMMn9nO7WixxJiCP+1ZohyReheI7501QjMcM86osiocN6Mq 5lgMlbVy3+/b3Ec/3y0YzLetwfrjys8ZaFxTsxVtQjA5YjSPqpTx3NauC/m69vP3a4/F fnvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M+QGMxG1VsY1sGMx29dDswRr8Ma9Jxo+n1WQTqWZbAEY9ahmw ub7LeYOizydOYLtos6o1LllQByKzLcgpHcbOVxD2SSShDHGfFQaw6lVK+F38OKgM0zUOzy83GSH MAUbk/QvkWW42X/w= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3142:: with SMTP id x63mr4161327wmx.168.1603824539984; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybtnYMJFLOMOYX/38ofxKnjGPvJoNRjWh1MyojQm7QS9CELAZwhAXerQsiP2b4PPtckgixKg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3142:: with SMTP id x63mr4161306wmx.168.1603824539806; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm3202915wrp.59.2020.10.27.11.48.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitlab for upstream qemu repo? To: Michael Roth , Peter Maydell References: <672b8aa0-2128-23e1-b778-01a4d96b209d@redhat.com> <20201027131452.6q4tqvp6a75zj7kk@vm0> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <626eb3e1-cb34-d667-b937-5cfdd8bd9e52@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:48:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201027131452.6q4tqvp6a75zj7kk@vm0> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/27 01:06:07 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.167, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel , Michael Roth , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 27/10/20 14:14, Michael Roth wrote: > My only concern would be what the lag time might be between updates to > qemu-web.git and the actual website update if the mirroring doesn't > right away. Probably not a huge deal but might be good to know what the > upper bound is if we want to verify the update process went okay. If gitlab became the primary repo for qemu-web.git, deployment would be done differently; either by rsyncing directly to qemu.org, or by making www.qemu.org a proxy for qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu. Thanks, Paolo