Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow building vhost-user in BSD

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>]

On 2/3/22 18:55, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 2/3/22 18:31, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 06:18:59PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/22 18:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> On 3/2/22 12:36, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>>>>>> With the possibility of using pipefd as a replacement on operating
>>>>>> systems that doesn't support eventfd, vhost-user can also work on BSD
>>>>>> systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This change allows enabling vhost-user on BSD platforms too and
>>>>>> makes libvhost_user (which still depends on eventfd) a linux-only
>>>>>> feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would just check for !windows.
>>>>
>>>> What about Darwin / Haiku / Illumnos?
>>>
>>> It should work on every system providing pipe() or pipe2(), so I guess
>>> Paolo's right, every platform except Windows. FWIW, I already tested
>>> it with Darwin.
>>
>> Wow, nice.
>>
>> So maybe simply check for pipe/pipe2 rather than !windows?
> 
> NB that would make the check more fragile.
> 
> We already use pipe/pipe2 without checking for it, because its
> usage is confined to oslib-posix.c and we know all POSIX
> OS have it. There is no impl at all of qemu_pipe in oslib-win.c
> and the declaration is masked out too in the header file.
> 
> Thus if we check for pipe2 and windows did ever implement it,
> then we would actually break the windows build due to qemu_pipe
> not existing.
> 
> IOW, checking !windows matches our logic for picking oslib-posix.c
> in builds and so is better than checking for pipe directly.

OK I see, thanks.