From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clhKq-0000sS-9i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 14:33:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clhKo-0006gw-RH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 14:33:20 -0500 References: <20170308181833.32110-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <91dff396-0e71-cb32-8353-edc4b644d5af@redhat.com> <20170308184610.GE5211@noname.redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <63437c2c-239e-a0af-d02e-c2993018ea93@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170308184610.GE5211@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IDHRg15BiIno6HvElGnMh7Ph85qlva0Gh" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] block/archipelago: Make it compile List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jeff Cody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chrysostomos Nanakos This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IDHRg15BiIno6HvElGnMh7Ph85qlva0Gh From: Eric Blake To: Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jeff Cody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Chrysostomos Nanakos Message-ID: <63437c2c-239e-a0af-d02e-c2993018ea93@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] block/archipelago: Make it compile References: <20170308181833.32110-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <91dff396-0e71-cb32-8353-edc4b644d5af@redhat.com> <20170308184610.GE5211@noname.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170308184610.GE5211@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/08/2017 12:46 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Oh, I meant to add: >>> >>> Should probably mention that it was commit da34e65 that introduced th= e >>> problem (if I'm right?). Does that mean we have not been compiling >>> archipelago.c since Mar 2016? >> >> At least here on my machine it does indeed compile before that commit >> and fails afterwards. So, yes, maybe we actually have not. :-) >=20 > In that case, maybe we should rather remove the driver because very > obviously nobody is interested in it, not even the maintainer. Keeping > things around that nobody tests (and consequently, nobody uses) is just= > a useless maintenance burden. We've released 2.6, 2.7, and 2.8 with no complaints about failure to compile. Sounds like a good candidate for removal in 2.9. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --IDHRg15BiIno6HvElGnMh7Ph85qlva0Gh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYwFxyAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqelcH/10I3ez1uavK2nJwLaZ0ov34 ovW+7th8lyKa+E7k8C4VFfY3UGqU+QVEdnKEqfDCDFJxY2kAXtebRpJw84pXF/a0 j/zzdi1YSyUtv3iHqJ3rqmBgelTEOGeSAgzYKlHbHjMSvLjvqd1Y7KBlfC+eqILg q5aFZZXsdq7manUa3WnWUt9p7vGcwTRvSdlW8L4iU4yFRmDL+tRAjtooqhtwwtRY 6gWv1BOytSVoTL6v78wScRcdXaERd/9sPQigGNUgGuquL3NyqRuLEVXCu/+5aXAT 9INqyzO3KX/Icm1gcF8K7Jlq0NAmF4tlkM2x6Uh5vfC96rtB2GG1S8Kum2hRMcU= =9tiF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IDHRg15BiIno6HvElGnMh7Ph85qlva0Gh--