From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxGm-0001a2-OW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:39:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxGj-00032z-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:39:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:47198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxGj-00031d-C0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:39:53 -0500 Message-ID: <645c648a489b0a89aecac337ab9d1bcd6412a5f5.camel@suse.com> From: Dario Faggioli Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:40:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <154219299016.19470.9372139354280787961.stgit@wayrath> <154219301447.19470.4834273682384554888.stgit@wayrath> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yl1J9RRqGCq107WbH66J" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] i386: add properties for customizing L2 and L3 caches size List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" --=-yl1J9RRqGCq107WbH66J Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 08:14 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/14/18 4:56 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > --- > > 0 files changed >=20 > That's an odd diffstat. Why is git not giving you the normal > diffstat=20 > with an actual summary of files changed? >=20 Ah, more weirdness about this submission. :-O I've just tried re-sending the series to myself and, for this patch, I do see a diffstat that makes sense: include/hw/i386/pc.h | 8 ++++++++ target/i386/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++ target/i386/cpu.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+) And same is true for all other series I've sent around in the same way and with the same tool (I went double checking a couple of them! :-P). So, clearly, something went wrong this time. :-/ Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Software Engineer @ SUSE https://www.suse.com/ --=-yl1J9RRqGCq107WbH66J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEES5ssOj3Vhr0WPnOLFkJ4iaW4c+4FAlvsQdIACgkQFkJ4iaW4 c+7o8RAA3/apWwuJns2maQLajvZHULUXic10kzccu9Djg10DoIjRsGq3WmOC2UYr w17Sgl6xQaUD614llWiJTNMzW0dJxpO4OZ4b8c68YG7xDRzcoOKe7Q6AgQOQG1ee rOoiHTdzA9oZLSFcgLDVpYhWIl7VojGTgNEIs0kUzupM3iFKpyVLcwCEY4L86adm uUyDgoeNGJ8AZF3pIeKhsrECnA4IhHFfvWq2x1vXiCPRD21modQqqA/7IYuTDcnt oJDUe7EJYjbbzamCfUoD/UwJV8aGpPpMcN6o19Bf1dfXzAxDdB+Hbl5rERihI3og N9UP5KJt+Zy7Aw1SBepm9PaIog66t5aRmstXVvtGrVU7MtzS+PxitTExsf5AbWkg 7/Xe0A9d6bGaMiOqUqn5MdahgdH2rUk2tgN3lViiI7xi6+82B/7aOu18kKLD1IB4 KY9bxzZ2HqjSz5ZECCpIle+K2aaoqqISAX3U/ZuC8FM7YmoMMTVp00dUgxehCxXW RY419RQrhtfZITkwNIT1y9yaA9wzf10pow0zVx5aDZVwqLNshe2OqAstx8ZwKZ+1 GOxd8Slj9gMWBRj5rtpowzbMyFVfEtMj1r3tUQSYmsm2Uui/XDlULOKZ0jyVmNmP 9BjooMumVQkPJq0j8rExY+HHR6OjxqgAJk6iA6z67qYzMStbaqI= =aGBG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yl1J9RRqGCq107WbH66J--