Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] hw/cxl: Use define for build bug detection

[Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>]

Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:19:12 -0700
> Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 May 2023 19:45:54 -0700
> > > Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Magic numbers can be confusing.
> > > > 
> > > > Use the range size define for CXL.cachemem rather than a magic number.
> > > > Update/add spec references.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>  
> > > 
> > > I guess we should do a scrub to move all refs to 3.0 soon
> > > given it's horrible having a mixture of spec versions for the references.
> > > 
> > > For future specs, we should only do this when sufficient X.Y references
> > > have started to appear - I think that's true for r3.0 now.  
> > 
> > For the kernel side I think Dan is taking the 'if you are updating it then
> > update the spec' but otherwise leave it be.  So since I'm touching the
> > code I updated it.
> > 
> > I agree, it is a pain to have to look at the 2.0 spec but you can do it.
> 
> Only if you are either a member of the consortium, or happened to have
> grabbed a copy in the past I think.  I've had people mentioning they can't
> get it today.
> 

Oh.  :-(  That seems unfortunate.  I've emailed the CXL admins.  Perhaps
they can post an archive page or something?

Ira