From: "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"quintela@redhat.com" <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] migration: clear the memory region dirty bitmap when skipping free pages
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:58:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64973ae51976490b864ded3ff628058c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25a2203f-fe82-41a6-ab40-2e4b5522fa14@redhat.com>
On Wednesday, July 14, 2021 6:30 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 14.07.21 12:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:51:04AM -0400, Wei Wang wrote:
> >> When skipping free pages, their corresponding dirty bits in the
> >> memory region dirty bitmap need to be cleared. Otherwise the skipped
> >> pages will be sent in the next round after the migration thread syncs
> >> dirty bits from the memory region dirty bitmap.
> >>
> >> migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap_range is put outside the
> >> bitmap_mutex, becasue
> >
> > because?
> >
> >> memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap is possible to block on the kvm slot
> >> mutex (don't want holding bitmap_mutex while blocked on another
> >> mutex), and clear_bmap_test_and_clear uses atomic operation.
>
> How is that different from our existing caller?
>
> Please either clean everything up, completely avoiding the lock (separate
> patch), or move it under the lock.
>
> Or am I missing something important?
That seems ok to me and Peter to have it outside the lock. Not sure if Dave or Juan knows the reason why clear_bmap needs to be under the mutex given that it is atomic operation.
Best,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 7:51 [PATCH v1] migration: clear the memory region dirty bitmap when skipping free pages Wei Wang
2021-07-14 10:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-14 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-14 14:58 ` Wang, Wei W [this message]
2021-07-14 15:24 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64973ae51976490b864ded3ff628058c@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).