From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvQZL-0002iT-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 12:49:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvQZK-0002R5-KO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 12:49:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]:41314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvQZK-0002Gv-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 12:49:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id b7so7340190pfi.8 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 09:49:23 -0800 (PST) References: <20190214125107.22178-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <20190214125107.22178-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <65025d72-2213-bd18-f5e6-99d97547354e@linaro.org> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 09:49:18 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190214125107.22178-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] hw/arm/armsse: Fix miswiring of expansion IRQs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: patches@linaro.org On 2/14/19 4:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > In commit 91c1e9fcbd7548db368 where we added dual-CPU support to > the ARMSSE, we set up the wiring of the expansion IRQs via nested > loops: the outer loop on 'i' loops for each CPU, and the inner loop > on 'j' loops for each interrupt. Fix a typo which meant we were > wiring every expansion IRQ line to external IRQ 0 on CPU 0 and > to external IRQ 1 on CPU 1. > > Fixes: 91c1e9fcbd7548db368 ("hw/arm/armsse: Support dual-CPU configuration") > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > hw/arm/armsse.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~