From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56913)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UzvqS-00063X-4l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:34:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UzvqQ-0000GN-Q5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:34:40 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26420)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1UzvqQ-0000GD-I0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:34:38 -0400
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:34:29 -0400
Message-ID: <6517417.4xQE50F6tB@sifl>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9sx8J8hnMJQ1gO2LDY8a6jLLwopp4gg_QE6CcDW-DRog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1373998058-20012-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4525023.VH0hS8hhdM@sifl>
	<CAFEAcA9sx8J8hnMJQ1gO2LDY8a6jLLwopp4gg_QE6CcDW-DRog@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] seccomp: remove unused syscalls - for 1.6
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:31:46 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 July 2013 21:05, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 08:48:10 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close to being pretty much
> >> > feature complete (excluding new architectures that may pop up, at
> >> > present
> >> > we are only x86, x86_64, x32, and ARM)
> >> 
> >> ...AArch64 ? :-)
> > 
> > Not yet, just 32-bit ARM EABI.
> > 
> > If you've got a working system and are willing to so some hacking or run
> > some tests we could work on it for a future libseccomp release.  An
> > emulated AArch64 VM would also work, but that route can be slow/annoying.
> 
> Simulators are all we have right now (we're juuust getting to the
> point where hardware is starting to become available). I wasn't
> being serious really, though I'm sure somebody (possibly even
> somebody at Red Hat :-)) will work around to it at some point.

Regardless, consider it a standing offer.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat