From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFC9C433F5 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653A760F35 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:28:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 653A760F35 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOjNy-0002RY-Da for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:28:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOjI1-0004mS-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:09 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:45849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOjHy-0005wN-Hy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631290924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QVnKdlR2yzsyuocphoJzSErt0Gsf1DAAYVRO6ys2NuE=; b=XMfp+U3Dnf4FKFyrtbE660HwoUeBlDGgOYS3ZMR6phbAb89JX2ekXHVcCGVNntOhjx5Sm7 zZNRvExKLFkMqiKJtz+Q54EGBTUQUTNDtwR9nsNjUXhxzws8QSE7l5gI1LDWOUUWDbe72O pcobmi8kX1quxxpUmgONNlsXnkF6CNk= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-517-vBgudPgHM96Tv4RH0izkBw-1; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: vBgudPgHM96Tv4RH0izkBw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id y23-20020a05600c365700b003015b277f98so444487wmq.2 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:22:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QVnKdlR2yzsyuocphoJzSErt0Gsf1DAAYVRO6ys2NuE=; b=Cl0F1U2+nZF8dyOsYKZsZ2RKVTIvF0puKkFBVcf1o5kWSwJqC5i2THwCYdLilefR9s pQjEF1ABA1g/uj1AdUUIDUXOSFvC70pnbKAUbQ/QtjA074IkqoU0tpsVcF3folDT3dvU 53TOcJzHOo2Hdd76iPMOyOAcY4iSeFGH7V+93GJEFiN5evq5GdklWxpvdRSyKyYE1XLT fu9tTz7A5UE0U/1MIAsJN0wAuUNOJRtWzLQJ4cPZLzY5HXsvFjiq1h+uC9exqjO3vcVo T2SOvCHmTVJbuYBtY8vfQStTgdDCuUCnH8rN9YMwTR3gLWi6W2Ct4xHugzpZyMMUipSQ w8QA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RO2pHDmNaohtW66WQ9sPzkS76GOngXtBpoZUnsf8hd0dVZDBL zCIw3hLiCHSy9h5Y9U4tnrZhwmRqglSGXMT3ZNg9G/vvofhlww8KzZJ/4k5ae+9uFvCp6obkqMS hpF+MSaRkVbl9NIIDw/Z3cSZefmBpL3/+S2L+a7TTmPItYExYal68PyfG59fN885olHM= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b10:: with SMTP id v16mr10746146wrq.176.1631290922277; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztDOCpHkDEbkXb1e9F4WPMWXF8v2KIHJ6JBWDDpEnNQxf4pB2ALNK8rNPlUvoyU74oVET2Mw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b10:: with SMTP id v16mr10746120wrq.176.1631290922030; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b24sm4499627wmj.43.2021.09.10.09.22.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: applied? Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Update NVMM support to recent changes, [PATCH v1 1/2] Only check CONFIG_NVMM when NEED_CPU_H is defined, [PATCH v1 2/2] Fix nvmm_ram_block_added() function arguments To: Reinoud Zandijk , Peter Maydell References: <20210718134650.1191-3-reinoud@NetBSD.org> <20210718134650.1191-2-reinoud@NetBSD.org> <20210718134650.1191-1-reinoud@NetBSD.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <65a259f0-1e5e-3eff-85cb-8f34f70ffe6c@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:21:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -54 X-Spam_score: -5.5 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.392, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.349, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 07/09/21 18:02, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: > ping? Queued, thanks. Paolo > On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 at 17:06, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: >>> >>> Hi :) >>> >>> Have these patches been applied? How can I easily check it without manually >>> checking if they are there in a git pullup? Am I notified normally when >>> patches are applied? >> >> Generally when a submaintainer picks up a patchset they'll send >> an email reply to the patch cover letter to say they've done so. >> At that point it should get into upstream git eventually. >> Until that happens it's the initial submitter's responsibility to >> 'ping' the patch after a few weeks if nobody's replied to it >> or reviewed it. >> >> Ccing Paolo who seems to have taken the initial nvmm patches >> through his tree. >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >