qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Nikolay Shirokovskiy <nshirokovskiy@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Maxim Nestratov <mnestratov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] dirty bitmap state uncertainty under certain conditions
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:07:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6602e519-1d25-86be-855e-d29155ec267c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fb12281-1023-71c0-7fd9-39e27787c1e9@virtuozzo.com>



On 11/22/2016 07:01 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
>   There is a problem with current incremental backups. Imagine I ask qemu to
> make an incremental backup then go away and return back when backup
> job is finished. Qemu process dismisses the job completely and I missed
> all the events so I don't know the result of the operation and what is
> most important I don't know the base for dirty bitmap now. In case of failure
> it is previous backup and in case of success it is the last backup. Qemu does
> not track dirty bitmap base for me so I have no choice other then clear
> dirty bitmap and make full backup which would be rather unexpected from user
> POV (The situation of going away/coming back is libvirt crash/restart of course.)
>

Why was the completion/failure event missed? Is there some reason why 
you cannot guarantee that you will observe the completion?

>   I guess problem has wider scope. In case I miss successfull completion of full
> backup my only option is to drop backup file and redo the backup completely
> which is rather wasteful. AFAIU I can not query backup completion result from
> backup file itself. I guess there can be similar issues for other qemu jobs.
>
> Nikolay
>

I would personally advocate for a job-neutral solution where jobs can be 
given a parameter such that the job persists in memory in a new 
"completed" state until such time that it is queried explicitly, then it 
can be dropped.

I am not sure if we can make this the default behavior, as it might 
confuse libvirt to occasionally see jobs that have already completed.

Talking to Kevin off-list, he suggested that we might be able to make 
this the default behavior if we pivot to the new jobs API that I have 
been proposing, accompanied by a new explicit command to put a command 
to rest.

I can work on this for 2.9; though we may still need a "temporary" 
solution for the old jobs API until we're ready to officially deprecate 
the older interface.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-22 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2fb12281-1023-71c0-7fd9-39e27787c1e9@virtuozzo.com>
2016-11-22 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] dirty bitmap state uncertainty under certain conditions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-11-22 13:38 ` Nikolay Shirokovskiy
2016-11-22 16:07 ` John Snow [this message]
2016-11-22 16:16   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-11-22 16:16   ` Eric Blake
2016-11-22 17:26     ` John Snow
2016-11-23  9:40       ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6602e519-1d25-86be-855e-d29155ec267c@redhat.com \
    --to=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=mnestratov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=nshirokovskiy@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).