Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Refine some vdi code

[yuchenlin <yuchenlin@synology.com>]

Hi, Stefan

I agree that redundancy of If else may helps people to understand the code.

However, CONFIG_VDI_WRITE only contributes:

#if defined(CONFIG_VDI_WRITE)
.bdrv_co_pwritev = vdi_co_pwritev,
#endif

I think we don't need CONFIG_VDI_WRITE to document the code.
As its name implies, vdi_co_pwritev shows the code parts for vdi write support.


I appreciated your time and effort for reviews.

Regards,
yuchenlin


Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> 於 2018-07-30 15:13 寫道：
> Am 30.07.2018 um 04:46 schrieb yuchenlin@synology.com: > From: yuchenlin <yuchenlin@synology.com> > > This series refine some code in vdi.c, includes: > > * Remvoe CONFIG_VDI_WRITE because there is no reason to leave an always on > and cannot configure option in the code-side. > * decouple if else if chain to get more readability. > > Thanks, > yuchenlin > > yuchenlin (2): > vdi: remove CONFIG_VDI_WRITE > vdi: refine code for vdi_open > > block/vdi.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) Technically these changes are fine, but personally I prefer my old code. If else is rendundant here, but redundancy helps humans to understand the code. CONFIG_VDI_WRITE still has a similar function as it documents which code parts are relevant for write support. Stefan