From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <666b9711b23d807525be06992fffd4d782ee80c7.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230105145313.168489-3-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 15:53 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
> The topology information are attributes of the CPU and are
> specified during the CPU device creation.
>
> On hot plug, we gather the topology information on the core,
> creates a list of topology entries, each entry contains a single
> core mask of each core with identical topology and finaly we
s/finaly/finally/
> orders the list in topological order.
s/orders/order/
> The topological order is, from higher to lower priority:
> - physical topology
> - drawer
> - book
> - socket
> - core origin, offset in 64bit increment from core 0.
> - modifier attributes
> - CPU type
> - polarization entitlement
> - dedication
>
> The possibility to insert a CPU in a mask is dependent on the
> number of cores allowed in a socket, a book or a drawer, the
> checking is done during the hot plug of the CPU to have an
> immediate answer.
>
> If the complete topology is not specified, the core is added
> in the physical topology based on its core ID and it gets
> defaults values for the modifier attributes.
>
> This way, starting QEMU without specifying the topology can
> still get some adventage of the CPU topology.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 48 ++++++
> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 10 ++
> hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 352 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> index d945b57fc3..b3fd752d8d 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
> #ifndef HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
> #define HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>
> +#include "qemu/queue.h"
> +#include "hw/boards.h"
> +
> #define S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_IFL 0x03
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAX_ORIGIN ((63 + S390_MAX_CPUS) / 64)
>
> #define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_HORIZONTAL 0x00
> #define S390_TOPOLOGY_POLARITY_VERTICAL_LOW 0x01
> @@ -20,4 +24,48 @@
> #define S390_TOPOLOGY_SHARED 0x00
> #define S390_TOPOLOGY_DEDICATED 0x01
>
> +typedef union s390_topology_id {
> + uint64_t id;
> + struct {
> + uint64_t level_6:8; /* byte 0 BE */
> + uint64_t level_5:8; /* byte 1 BE */
> + uint64_t drawer:8; /* byte 2 BE */
> + uint64_t book:8; /* byte 3 BE */
> + uint64_t socket:8; /* byte 4 BE */
> + uint64_t rsrv:5;
> + uint64_t d:1;
> + uint64_t p:2; /* byte 5 BE */
> + uint64_t type:8; /* byte 6 BE */
> + uint64_t origin:2;
This is two bits because it's the core divided by 64, and we have 248 cores at most?
Where is this set?
> + uint64_t core:6; /* byte 7 BE */
> + };
> +} s390_topology_id;
This struct seems to do double duty, 1. it represents a cpu and 2. a topology entry.
You also use it for sorting.
I would suggest to just use a cpu object when referring to a specific cpu and
put the relevant fields directly into the topology entry.
You get rid of the bit field that way.
You'd then need a comparison function for a cpu object and a topology entry.
As long as that isn't the only type pair that shouldn't be too ugly.
> +#define TOPO_CPU_MASK 0x000000000000003fUL
> +
> +typedef struct S390TopologyEntry {
> + s390_topology_id id;
> + QTAILQ_ENTRY(S390TopologyEntry) next;
> + uint64_t mask;
> +} S390TopologyEntry;
> +
> +typedef struct S390Topology {
> + QTAILQ_HEAD(, S390TopologyEntry) list;
> + uint8_t *sockets;
> + CpuTopology *smp;
> +} S390Topology;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +bool s390_has_topology(void);
> +void s390_topology_set_cpu(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp);
> +#else
> +static inline bool s390_has_topology(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +static inline void s390_topology_set_cpu(MachineState *ms,
> + S390CPU *cpu,
> + Error **errp) {}
> +#endif
> +extern S390Topology s390_topology;
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..438055c612
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
> +/*
> + * CPU Topology
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> +
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
> +#include "hw/boards.h"
> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * s390_topology is used to keep the topology information.
> + * .list: queue the topology entries inside which
> + * we keep the information on the CPU topology.
> + *
> + * .smp: keeps track of the machine topology.
> + *
> + * .socket: tracks information on the count of cores per socket.
> + *
> + */
> +S390Topology s390_topology = {
> + .list = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(s390_topology.list),
> + .sockets = NULL, /* will be initialized after the cpu model is realized */
I guess you should do the same for .smp then also.
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_socket_nb:
> + * @id: s390_topology_id
> + *
> + * Returns the socket number used inside the socket array.
> + */
> +static int s390_socket_nb(s390_topology_id id)
> +{
> + return (id.socket + 1) * (id.book + 1) * (id.drawer + 1);
This calculation doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
It's symmetric with regards to the variables, so (s=0 b=1 d=1)
will have the same result as (s=1 b=0 d=1).
You want the "global" socket number right?
So that would be (drawer * books_per_drawer + book) * sockets_per_book + socket.
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_has_topology:
> + *
> + * Return value: if the topology is supported by the machine.
> + */
> +bool s390_has_topology(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_init:
> + * @ms: the machine state where the machine topology is defined
> + *
> + * Keep track of the machine topology.
> + * Allocate an array to keep the count of cores per socket.
> + * The index of the array starts at socket 0 from book 0 and
> + * drawer 0 up to the maximum allowed by the machine topology.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms)
> +{
> + CpuTopology *smp = &ms->smp;
> +
> + s390_topology.smp = smp;
> + if (!s390_topology.sockets) {
Is this function being called multiple times, or why the if?
Use an assert instead?
> + s390_topology.sockets = g_new0(uint8_t, smp->sockets *
> + smp->books * smp->drawers);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_from_cpu:
> + * @cpu: The S390CPU
> + *
> + * Initialize the topology id from the CPU environment.
> + */
> +static s390_topology_id s390_topology_from_cpu(S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + s390_topology_id topology_id;
> +
> + topology_id.core = cpu->env.core_id;
> + topology_id.type = cpu->env.cpu_type;
> + topology_id.p = cpu->env.polarity;
> + topology_id.d = cpu->env.dedicated;
> + topology_id.socket = cpu->env.socket_id;
> + topology_id.book = cpu->env.book_id;
> + topology_id.drawer = cpu->env.drawer_id;
> +
> + return topology_id;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_set_entry:
> + * @entry: Topology entry to setup
> + * @id: topology id to use for the setup
> + *
> + * Set the core bit inside the topology mask and
> + * increments the number of cores for the socket.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_set_entry(S390TopologyEntry *entry,
Not sure if I like the name, what it does is to add a cpu to the entry.
> + s390_topology_id id)
> +{
> + set_bit(63 - id.core, &entry->mask);
You need to subtract the origin first or that might be negative.
> + s390_topology.sockets[s390_socket_nb(id)]++;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_new_entry:
> + * @id: s390_topology_id to add
> + *
> + * Allocate a new entry and initialize it.
> + *
> + * returns the newly allocated entry.
> + */
> +static S390TopologyEntry *s390_topology_new_entry(s390_topology_id id)
> +{
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry;
> +
> + entry = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390TopologyEntry));
> + entry->id.id = id.id & ~TOPO_CPU_MASK;
> + s390_topology_set_entry(entry, id);
> +
> + return entry;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_insert:
> + *
> + * @id: s390_topology_id to insert.
> + *
> + * Parse the topology list to find if the entry already
> + * exist and add the core in it.
> + * If it does not exist, allocate a new entry and insert
> + * it in the queue from lower id to greater id.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_insert(s390_topology_id id)
> +{
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry;
> + S390TopologyEntry *tmp = NULL;
> + uint64_t new_id;
> +
> + new_id = id.id & ~TOPO_CPU_MASK;
> +
> + /* First CPU to add to an entry */
> + if (QTAILQ_EMPTY(&s390_topology.list)) {
> + entry = s390_topology_new_entry(id);
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&s390_topology.list, entry, next);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(tmp, &s390_topology.list, next) {
> + if (new_id == tmp->id.id) {
> + s390_topology_set_entry(tmp, id);
> + return;
> + } else if (new_id < tmp->id.id) {
> + entry = s390_topology_new_entry(id);
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(tmp, entry, next);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + entry = s390_topology_new_entry(id);
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s390_topology.list, entry, next);
Consider adding a sentinel entry "at infinity", then that whole code
would simplify.
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_check:
> + * @errp: Error pointer
> + * id: s390_topology_id to be verified
> + *
> + * The function checks if the topology id fits inside the
> + * system topology.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_check(Error **errp, s390_topology_id id)
> +{
> + CpuTopology *smp = s390_topology.smp;
> +
> + if (id.socket > smp->sockets) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable socket: %d", id.socket);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (id.book > smp->books) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable book: %d", id.book);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (id.drawer > smp->drawers) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable drawer: %d", id.drawer);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (id.type != S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_IFL) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Unknown cpu type: %d", id.type);
> + return;
> + }
> + /* Polarity and dedication can never be wrong */
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_cpu_default:
> + * @errp: Error pointer
> + * @cpu: pointer to a S390CPU
> + *
> + * Setup the default topology for unset attributes.
> + *
> + * The function accept only all all default values or all set values
> + * for the geometry topology.
> + *
> + * The function calculates the (drawer_id, book_id, socket_id)
> + * topology by filling the cores starting from the first socket
> + * (0, 0, 0) up to the last (smp->drawers, smp->books, smp->sockets).
> + *
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_cpu_default(Error **errp, S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + CpuTopology *smp = s390_topology.smp;
> + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
> +
> + /* All geometry topology attributes must be set or all unset */
> + if ((env->socket_id < 0 || env->book_id < 0 || env->drawer_id < 0) &&
> + (env->socket_id >= 0 || env->book_id >= 0 || env->drawer_id >= 0)) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "Please define all or none of the topology geometry attributes");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if one of the geometry topology is unset */
> + if (env->socket_id < 0) {
> + /* Calculate default geometry topology attributes */
> + env->socket_id = (env->core_id / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
> + env->book_id = (env->core_id / (smp->sockets * smp->cores)) %
> + smp->books;
> + env->drawer_id = (env->core_id /
> + (smp->books * smp->sockets * smp->cores)) %
> + smp->drawers;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_set_cpu:
> + * @ms: MachineState used to initialize the topology structure on
> + * first call.
> + * @cpu: the new S390CPU to insert in the topology structure
> + * @errp: the error pointer
> + *
> + * Called from CPU Hotplug to check and setup the CPU attributes
> + * before to insert the CPU in the topology.
> + */
> +void s390_topology_set_cpu(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> +{
> + Error *local_error = NULL;
Can't you just use ERRP_GUARD ?
> + s390_topology_id id;
> +
> + /*
> + * We do not want to initialize the topology if the cpu model
> + * does not support topology consequently, we have to wait for
", consequently," I think. Could you do the initialization some where else,
after you know what the cpu model is? Not that I object to doing it this way.
> + * the first CPU to be realized, which realizes the CPU model
> + * to initialize the topology structures.
> + *
> + * s390_topology_set_cpu() is called from the cpu hotplug.
> + */
> + if (!s390_topology.sockets) {
> + s390_topology_init(ms);
> + }
> +
> + s390_topology_cpu_default(&local_error, cpu);
> + if (local_error) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_error);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + id = s390_topology_from_cpu(cpu);
> +
> + /* Check for space on the socket */
> + if (s390_topology.sockets[s390_socket_nb(id)] >=
> + s390_topology.smp->sockets) {
> + error_setg(&local_error, "No more space on socket");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + s390_topology_check(&local_error, id);
> + if (local_error) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_error);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + s390_topology_insert(id);
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index f3cc845d3b..c98b93a15f 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> #include "migration/blocker.h"
> #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>
> static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>
> @@ -310,10 +311,19 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> {
> MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
>
> + if (s390_has_topology()) {
> + s390_topology_set_cpu(ms, cpu, &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (dev->hotplugged) {
> raise_irq_cpu_hotplug();
> }
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/meson.build b/hw/s390x/meson.build
> index f291016fee..58dfbdff4f 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/s390x/meson.build
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ s390x_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_KVM', if_true: files(
> 's390-stattrib-kvm.c',
> 'pv.c',
> 's390-pci-kvm.c',
> + 'cpu-topology.c',
> ))
> s390x_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TCG', if_true: files(
> 'tod-tcg.c',
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-13 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-05 14:53 [PATCH v14 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: adding s390 specificities to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 11:37 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-16 16:32 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 7:25 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-13 16:58 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 17:28 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 20:34 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 9:49 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 7:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 13:00 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 9:23 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 18:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-13 18:15 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-01-17 13:55 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 16:48 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 14:29 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 9:16 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 17:14 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 16:58 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 16:56 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 10:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 11:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 13:11 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 15:39 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 8:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 17:36 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 19:58 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 17:52 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 17:44 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 9:00 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 17:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 18:24 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-18 9:54 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-20 14:32 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 10:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 10:01 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: change-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 10:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-12 8:00 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 14:23 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 12:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 13:17 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 21:09 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 7:30 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 13:31 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-18 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 14:09 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 15:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-01-18 15:48 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 14:06 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: monitor query topology information Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:48 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 15:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 12:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-12 17:27 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-12 17:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 15:58 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 16:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 16:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:52 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 17:09 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-20 11:56 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-20 14:22 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:46 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-19 14:48 ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 17:10 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=666b9711b23d807525be06992fffd4d782ee80c7.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).