From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
Wen Congyang <wencongyang2@huawei.com>,
Xie Changlong <xiechanglong.d@gmail.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/14] job.c: enable job lock/unlock and remove Aiocontext locks
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:59:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66c34b8b-c363-4411-ff7e-0a2272fa1629@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a0523e4-58d2-ba43-f6d9-f5ff9b616549@virtuozzo.com>
On 18/12/2021 13:24, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 04.11.2021 17:53, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> --- a/block/replication.c
>> +++ b/block/replication.c
>> @@ -728,9 +728,11 @@ static void replication_stop(ReplicationState
>> *rs, bool failover, Error **errp)
>> * disk, secondary disk in backup_job_completed().
>> */
>> if (s->backup_job) {
>> + aio_context_release(aio_context);
>> job_lock();
>> job_cancel_sync(&s->backup_job->job, true);
>> job_unlock();
>> + aio_context_acquire(aio_context);
>
>
> Why we need it? If we never acquire aio context under job_lock, it
> should be safe to make a job-mutex critical section inside aio-context
> critical section.
>
Right, it works also with the aio context taken.
I will remove this hunk.
Thank you,
Emanuele
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 14:53 [RFC PATCH v2 00/14] job: replace AioContext lock with job_mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/14] job.c: make job_lock/unlock public Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] job.h: categorize fields in struct Job Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-12-21 14:23 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] job.h: define locked functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-12-16 17:11 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-20 10:15 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/14] job.h: define unlocked functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/14] block/mirror.c: use of job helpers in drivers to avoid TOC/TOU Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-18 11:53 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-20 10:34 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-20 10:47 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-23 11:37 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/14] job.c: make job_event_* functions static Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:54 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/14] job.c: move inner aiocontext lock in callbacks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/14] aio-wait.h: introduce AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/14] jobs: remove aiocontext locks since the functions are under BQL Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/14] jobs: protect jobs with job_lock/unlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-18 11:57 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/14] block_job_query: remove atomic read Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-18 12:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-23 11:37 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/14] jobs: use job locks and helpers also in the unit tests Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/14] jobs: add job lock in find_* functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-18 12:11 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-18 12:22 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-11-04 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/14] job.c: enable job lock/unlock and remove Aiocontext locks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-18 12:24 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-23 14:59 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66c34b8b-c363-4411-ff7e-0a2272fa1629@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).