qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, riku.voipio@iki.fi
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: ppc64: use the correct values for F_*LK64s
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:27:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66db5df6-4b19-8c33-0095-dcdd61a7c976@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36ca4564-3d16-85e0-6391-c85f058f747b@vivier.eu>



On 07/12/2018 12:36 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 12/07/2018 à 09:00, Shivaprasad G Bhat a écrit :
>>
>> On 07/12/2018 02:21 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Le 11/07/2018 à 15:04, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>>>> Le 11/07/2018 à 12:55, Shivaprasad G Bhat a écrit :
>>>>> Qemu includes the glibc headers for the host defines and target
>>>>> headers are
>>>>> part of the qemu source themselves. The glibc has the F_GETLK64,
>>>>> F_SETLK64
>>>>> and F_SETLKW64 defined to 12, 13 and 14 for all archs(generic) in
>>>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/fcntl-linux.h. The linux kernel generic
>>>>> definition for F_*LK is 5, 6 & 7 and F_*LK64* is 12,13, and 14 as
>>>>> seen in
>>>>> include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h. On 64bit machine, by default the
>>>>> kernel
>>>>> assumes all F_*LK to 64bit calls and doesnt support use of F_*LK64* as
>>>>> can be seen in include/linux/fcntl.h in linux source.
>>>>>
>>>>> On x86_64 host, the values for F_*LK64* are set to 5, 6 and 7
>>>>> explicitly in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl.h by the glibc.
>>>>> Whereas, a PPC64 host doesn't have such a definition in
>>>>> /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl.h by the glibc. So,
>>>>> the sources on PPC64 host sees the default value of F_*LK64*
>>>>> as 12, 13 & 14(fcntl-linux.h).
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the 64bit kernel doesnt support 12, 13 & 14; the glibc fcntl
>>>>> syscall
>>>>> implementation(__libc_fcntl*(), __fcntl64_nocancel) does the
>>>>> F_*LK64* value
>>>>> convertion back to F_*LK* values on PPC64 as seen in
>>>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/sysdep.h with
>>>>> FCNTL_ADJUST_CMD()
>>>>> macro. Whereas on x86_64 host the values for F_*LK64* are set to 5,
>>>>> 6 and 7
>>>>> and no adjustments are needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since qemu doesnt use the glibc fcntl, but makes the safe_syscall*
>>>>> on its
>>>>> own, the PPC64 qemu is calling the syscall with 12, 13, and 14(without
>>>>> adjustment) and they all fail. The fcntl calls to F_GETLK/F_SETLK|W all
>>>>> fail by all pplications run on PPC64 host user emulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix here could be to see why on PPC64 the glibc is still keeping
>>>>> F_*LK64* different from F_*LK and why adjusting them to 5, 6 and 7
>>>>> before
>>>>> the syscall for PPC only. See if we can make the
>>>>> /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl.h to have the values
>>>>> 5, 6 & 7 just like x86_64 and remove the adjustment code in glibc.
>>>>> That way,
>>>>> qemu sources see the kernel supported values in glibc headers.
>>>>>
>>>>> OR
>>>>>
>>>>> On PPC64 host, qemu sources see both F_LK* & F_LK64* as same and set to
>>>>> 12, 13 and 14 because __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 is defined in qemu
>>>>> sources(also refer sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/fcntl-linux.h).
>>>>> Since F_*LK and F_*LK64 are same, the value adjument like done by
>>>>> glibc in
>>>>> qemu sources is difficult. So, Overwrite the glibc defaults with the
>>>>> actual
>>>>> supported values in Qemu. The current patch is doing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    linux-user/syscall.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
>>>>> index 7b9ac3b408..1693e69ce0 100644
>>>>> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
>>>>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
>>>>> @@ -250,6 +250,20 @@ static type name (type1 arg1,type2 arg2,type3
>>>>> arg3,type4 arg4,type5 arg5,    \
>>>>>    #define TARGET_NR__llseek TARGET_NR_llseek
>>>>>    #endif
>>>>>    +/* glibc headers has these defined to 12, 13 and 14 and is not
>>>>> supported
>>>>> + * by kernel. The glibc fcntl call actually adjusts them back to 5,
>>>>> 6 and 7
>>>>> + * before making the syscall(). Since we make the syscall directly,
>>>>> + * overwite/adjust to what is supported by the kernel.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__powerpc64__)
>>>>> +#undef F_GETLK64
>>>>> +#define F_GETLK64      5       /* Get record locking info.  */
>>>>> +#undef F_SETLK64
>>>>> +#define F_SETLK64      6       /* Set record locking info
>>>>> (non-blocking).  */
>>>>> +#undef F_SETLKW64
>>>>> +#define F_SETLKW64     7       /* Set record locking info
>>>>> (blocking).  */
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>>    #ifdef __NR_gettid
>>>>>    _syscall0(int, gettid)
>>>>>    #else
>>>>>
>>>> These macros are used in target_to_host_fcntl_cmd(), and this function
>>>> is used with safe_fcntl() and fcntl().
>>>>
>>>> So I think it would be cleaner to do the change after
>>>> target_to_host_fcntl_cmd() in do_fcntl() as it is done in glibc instead
>>>> of redefining system values. Something like:
>>>>
>>>> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
>>>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
>>>> @@ -6782,6 +6782,12 @@ static abi_long do_fcntl(int fd, int cmd,
>>>> abi_ulong arg)
>>>>        if (host_cmd == -TARGET_EINVAL)
>>>>               return host_cmd;
>>>>
>>>> +#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__powerpc64__)
>>>> +    if (host_cmd >= F_GETLK64 && host_cmd <= F_SETLKW64) {
>>>> +        host_cmd -= F_GETLK64 - F_GETLK;
>>> But as you said, __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 is defined in qemu, and F_GETLK is
>>> equal to F_GETLK64, so we should use something like:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>       host_cmd -= F_GETLK64 - 5;
>>> ...
> Hi Shivaprasad,
>
>> Hi Laurent, Thanks for the comments. I agree to the comments,
>> sending the v2 accordingly.
> Thank you.
>
> I did some tests, (qemu-hppa on ppc64 with dpkg), and we need the
> conversion with TARGET_NR_fcntl64 too because it also calls safe_fcntl()
> for TARGET_F_SETLK64 and TARGET_F_SETLKW64.
I moved the adjustment code inside target_to_host_fcntl_cmd() to address 
all cases for
future too. Just sent the v2.

Couldn't get the hppa config to work on my setup, and that part is not 
tested.

Regards,
Shivaprasad
>
> Thanks,
> Laurent
>

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-13  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11 10:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: ppc64: use the correct values for F_*LK64s Shivaprasad G Bhat
2018-07-11 13:04 ` Laurent Vivier
2018-07-11 13:07   ` Laurent Vivier
2018-07-11 20:51   ` Laurent Vivier
2018-07-12  7:00     ` Shivaprasad G Bhat
2018-07-12  7:06       ` Laurent Vivier
2018-07-13  5:57         ` Shivaprasad G Bhat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66db5df6-4b19-8c33-0095-dcdd61a7c976@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).