qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	"jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"julien.grall@arm.com" <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by libxendevicemodel
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:02:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6738c7d96a1c476187f69616f25b28d1@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1704191552450.31486@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:sstabellini@kernel.org]
> Sent: 20 April 2017 00:02
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabellini@kernel.org>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Wei Liu
> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; julien.grall@arm.com; xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by
> libxendevicemodel
> 
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:sstabellini@kernel.org]
> > > Sent: 18 April 2017 18:41
> > > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> > > Cc: 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabellini@kernel.org>; qemu-
> devel@nongnu.org;
> > > Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Wei Liu
> > > <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; julien.grall@arm.com; xen-
> > > devel@lists.xenproject.org
> > > Subject: RE: QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by
> > > libxendevicemodel
> > >
> > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:sstabellini@kernel.org]
> > > > > Sent: 15 April 2017 01:40
> > > > > To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; qemu-
> devel@nongnu.org;
> > > > > Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Wei Liu
> > > > > <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; julien.grall@arm.com; xen-
> > > > > devel@lists.xenproject.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by
> > > > > libxendevicemodel
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following commit in my qemu "next" branch breaks the build on
> > > arm
> > > > > > and arm64:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > commit 670271647ad15e9d937ced7a72c892349c709216
> > > > > > Author: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> > > > > > Date:   Tue Mar 7 10:55:34 2017 +0000
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     xen: use libxendevicemodel when available
> > > > > >
> > > > > > See the appended build log. Sorry for not realizing it sooner.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I imagined, this bug is easy to solve. It is reproducible on x86 too,
> > > > > if you pass -DXC_WANT_COMPAT_DEVICEMODEL_API=1 to configure
> > > and
> > > > > forcefully disable Xen 4.9 detection in the configure script.
> > > > >
> > > > > If QEMU detects xen_ctrl_version = 480, the build will fail against Xen
> > > > > 4.9, even when -DXC_WANT_COMPAT_DEVICEMODEL_API=1 is
> > > specified.
> > > > >
> > > > > The appended patch solves the problem. However, Xen 4.9 detection
> > > and
> > > > > compilation remain broken.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, that fix looks fine to me.
> > >
> > > I merged this change into "use libxendevicemodel when available" in my
> > > next branch.
> > >
> > > Are you going to take care of getting the QEMU build on ARM to work
> > > against Xen 4.9 (properly detecting 4.9, without
> > > -DXC_WANT_COMPAT_DEVICEMODEL_API=1)?
> > >
> >
> > I can take a look once I get access to some h/w. Since the 4.9 detection
> should merely be based upon the presence of libxendevicemodel, I can't
> really imagine why ARM should behave any differently to x86.
> 
> I managed to find the time to do some debugging. You are right that is
> not anything major. The bug is due to a missing -lxencall in the QEMU
> configure script, I wonder why it works on x86.

Yes, that's weird. libxendevicemodel does depend on libxencall for the case when the privcmd driver in dom0 does not support the new DM_OP ioctl, but that dependency should be there regardless of architecture.

> 
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 99d6cbc..363a126 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -2027,9 +2027,9 @@ int main(void) {
>    return 0;
>  }
>  EOF
> -        compile_prog "" "$xen_libs $xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel"
> +        compile_prog "" "$xen_libs $xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel -
> lxencall"
>        then
> -      xen_stable_libs="$xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel"
> +      xen_stable_libs="$xen_stable_libs -lxendevicemodel -lxencall"
>        xen_ctrl_version=40900
>        xen=yes
>      elif

I think xencall should be part of the base xen_stable_libs anyway.

Cheers,

   Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-14 22:50 [Qemu-devel] QEMU build breakage on ARM against Xen 4.9 caused by libxendevicemodel Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-15  0:39 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-18 10:00   ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-18 17:40     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-19  8:43       ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-19 23:02         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-20  8:02           ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2017-04-20 18:05             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-21  8:29               ` Paul Durrant
2017-05-03 16:48               ` Anthony PERARD
2017-05-03 16:52                 ` Wei Liu
2017-05-03 16:55                   ` Anthony PERARD
2017-05-04 11:08                     ` Wei Liu
2017-05-03 16:52                 ` Paul Durrant
2017-05-03 17:20                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-03 17:51                   ` Anthony PERARD
2017-05-03 20:30                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-05-03 20:38                       ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6738c7d96a1c476187f69616f25b28d1@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).