From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IMo10-00045M-Qd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:52:38 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IMo0y-00043l-NX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:52:37 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMo0y-00043a-J8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:52:36 -0400
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kronos.it@gmail.com>) id 1IMo0y-0006Y6-Lw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:52:36 -0400
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so584030waf
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <68676e00708190952g7d4751c2g87a6ff71dd278f71@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:52:33 +0200
From: Luca <kronos.it@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070818220252.GA19526@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070817231149.544849769@gmail.com>
	<1187450256.13580.1.camel@squirrel>
	<64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160D4645F0@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
	<20070818220252.GA19526@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer
	infrastrucure - take2
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: kvm-devel@lists.sf.net
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 8/19/07, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com> wrote:
> +static uint64_t qemu_next_deadline(void) {
> +    uint64_t nearest_delta_us = ULLONG_MAX;
> +    uint64_t vmdelta_us;

Hum, I introduced a bug here... those vars should be signed.

On the overhead introduced: how do you measure it?

Luca