From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INuAx-0003fw-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:39:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INuAv-0003eu-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:39:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INuAv-0003er-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:39:25 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1INuAv-00023D-4Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:39:25 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so260115waf for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <68676e00708221039r634f6b48g28f702a818a8240b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:39:23 +0200 From: Luca In-Reply-To: <68676e00708221023m352c2de3y3b19188dbb9ef49e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070817231149.544849769@gmail.com> <20070820212058.GA6713@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <46CAD607.2080504@qumranet.com> <20070821193834.GB13544@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <46CBC34F.6060601@qumranet.com> <20070822161211.GA30147@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <46CC6285.3090904@qumranet.com> <68676e00708220938y57c07edas705fc8360aefcb78@mail.gmail.com> <46CC680C.1030307@qumranet.com> <68676e00708221023m352c2de3y3b19188dbb9ef49e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Rework alarm timer infrastrucure - take2 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Dan Kenigsberg , kvm-devel@lists.sf.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 8/22/07, Luca wrote: > I see a lot of sub ms timer_settime(). Many of them are the result of > ->expire_time being less than the current qemu_get_clock(). False alarm, this was a bug in the debug code :D Luca