From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: Luc Michel <luc.michel@amd.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Mahmoud Mandour" <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Iooss" <erdnaxe@crans.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] contrib/plugins/hotblocks: migrate to new per_vcpu API
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:04:10 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68b1dff0-13db-4ad0-a1b0-a85991fb3374@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zd3xGrZetKoAbIn1@luc-work-vm>
On 2/27/24 6:26 PM, Luc Michel wrote:
> On 15:09 Tue 27 Feb , Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> On 2/27/24 2:54 PM, Luc Michel wrote:
>>> Hi Pierrick,
>>>
>>> On 13:14 Mon 26 Feb , Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c b/contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c
>>>> index 4de1b134944..02bc5078bdd 100644
>>>> --- a/contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c
>>>> +++ b/contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c
>>>> @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ static guint64 limit = 20;
>>>> */
>>>> typedef struct {
>>>> uint64_t start_addr;
>>>> - uint64_t exec_count;
>>>> - int trans_count;
>>>> + struct qemu_plugin_scoreboard *exec_count;
>>>> + int trans_count;
>>>> unsigned long insns;
>>>> } ExecCount;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -43,7 +43,17 @@ static gint cmp_exec_count(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
>>>> {
>>>> ExecCount *ea = (ExecCount *) a;
>>>> ExecCount *eb = (ExecCount *) b;
>>>> - return ea->exec_count > eb->exec_count ? -1 : 1;
>>>> + uint64_t count_a =
>>>> + qemu_plugin_u64_sum(qemu_plugin_scoreboard_u64(ea->exec_count));
>>>> + uint64_t count_b =
>>>> + qemu_plugin_u64_sum(qemu_plugin_scoreboard_u64(eb->exec_count));
>>>> + return count_a > count_b ? -1 : 1;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void exec_count_free(gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + ExecCount *cnt = value;
>>>> + qemu_plugin_scoreboard_free(cnt->exec_count);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
>>>> @@ -52,7 +62,6 @@ static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
>>>> GList *counts, *it;
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> - g_mutex_lock(&lock);
>>>
>>> I encountered cases before where the vCPUs continue executing while
>>> plugin_exit is called. This can happen e.g., when QEMU calls exit(3)
>>> from one CPU thread. Others will continue to run at the same time the
>>> atexit callbacks are called.
>>>
>>> This also means that you can't really free the resources as you do at
>>> the end of plugin_exit.
>>>
>>
>> Interesting...
>>
>> The current documentation [1] mentions it's the right place to free
>> resources, and from what I saw, existing plugins assume this too (see
>> contrib/plugins/cache.c for instance).
>>
>> There is probably a bug related to the case you mention, and I'll try to
>> reproduce this, and see if we can have a proper fix.
>>
>> I'm not sure that removing cleanup code from existing plugins is the
>> right thing to do at the moment, even though there is an existing issue
>> with some programs.
>
> Yes absolutely. The problem is on the QEMU side. FWIW I tried to fix one
> of those exit cases (semihosted exit syscall) some time ago:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220621125916.25257-1-lmichel@kalray.eu/
>
> IIRC Peter was not fundamentally against it. But then I was off for
> several months due to medical reasons.
>
> I can take some time to rebase it and address Peter's comments if there
> is interest to it.
>
It could be well appreciated, and definitely worth fixing!
> Luc
>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/tcg-plugins.html#c.qemu_plugin_register_atexit_cb
>>
>>>> g_string_append_printf(report, "%d entries in the hash table\n",
>>>> g_hash_table_size(hotblocks));
>>>> counts = g_hash_table_get_values(hotblocks);
>>>> @@ -63,16 +72,21 @@ static void plugin_exit(qemu_plugin_id_t id, void *p)
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < limit && it->next; i++, it = it->next) {
>>>> ExecCount *rec = (ExecCount *) it->data;
>>>> - g_string_append_printf(report, "0x%016"PRIx64", %d, %ld, %"PRId64"\n",
>>>> - rec->start_addr, rec->trans_count,
>>>> - rec->insns, rec->exec_count);
>>>> + g_string_append_printf(
>>>> + report, "0x%016"PRIx64", %d, %ld, %"PRId64"\n",
>>>> + rec->start_addr, rec->trans_count,
>>>> + rec->insns,
>>>> + qemu_plugin_u64_sum(
>>>> + qemu_plugin_scoreboard_u64(rec->exec_count)));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> g_list_free(it);
>>>> }
>>>> - g_mutex_unlock(&lock);
>>>>
>>>> qemu_plugin_outs(report->str);
>>>> +
>>>> + g_hash_table_foreach(hotblocks, exec_count_free, NULL);
>>>> + g_hash_table_destroy(hotblocks);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void plugin_init(void)
>>>> @@ -82,15 +96,9 @@ static void plugin_init(void)
>>>>
>>>> static void vcpu_tb_exec(unsigned int cpu_index, void *udata)
>>>> {
>>>> - ExecCount *cnt;
>>>> - uint64_t hash = (uint64_t) udata;
>>>> -
>>>> - g_mutex_lock(&lock);
>>>> - cnt = (ExecCount *) g_hash_table_lookup(hotblocks, (gconstpointer) hash);
>>>> - /* should always succeed */
>>>> - g_assert(cnt);
>>>> - cnt->exec_count++;
>>>> - g_mutex_unlock(&lock);
>>>> + ExecCount *cnt = (ExecCount *)udata;
>>>> + qemu_plugin_u64_add(qemu_plugin_scoreboard_u64(cnt->exec_count),
>>>> + cpu_index, 1);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -114,18 +122,20 @@ static void vcpu_tb_trans(qemu_plugin_id_t id, struct qemu_plugin_tb *tb)
>>>> cnt->start_addr = pc;
>>>> cnt->trans_count = 1;
>>>> cnt->insns = insns;
>>>> + cnt->exec_count = qemu_plugin_scoreboard_new(sizeof(uint64_t));
>>>> g_hash_table_insert(hotblocks, (gpointer) hash, (gpointer) cnt);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> g_mutex_unlock(&lock);
>>>>
>>>> if (do_inline) {
>>>> - qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_inline(tb, QEMU_PLUGIN_INLINE_ADD_U64,
>>>> - &cnt->exec_count, 1);
>>>> + qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_inline_per_vcpu(
>>>> + tb, QEMU_PLUGIN_INLINE_ADD_U64,
>>>> + qemu_plugin_scoreboard_u64(cnt->exec_count), 1);
>>>> } else {
>>>> qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_tb_exec_cb(tb, vcpu_tb_exec,
>>>> QEMU_PLUGIN_CB_NO_REGS,
>>>> - (void *)hash);
>>>> + (void *)cnt);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 9:14 [PATCH v5 00/12] TCG Plugin inline operation enhancement Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] plugins: scoreboard API Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] plugins: define qemu_plugin_u64 Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] plugins: implement inline operation relative to cpu_index Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] plugins: add inline operation per vcpu Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] tests/plugin: add test plugin for inline operations Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] tests/plugin/mem: migrate to new per_vcpu API Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 9:35 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-27 10:56 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 14:27 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-28 22:08 ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-29 5:19 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-29 7:08 ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-29 7:12 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-29 13:46 ` Alex Bennée
2024-03-01 9:41 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] tests/plugin/insn: " Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 9:50 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] tests/plugin/bb: " Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 10:02 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-29 14:21 ` Alex Bennée
2024-03-01 9:58 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-03-01 10:26 ` Alex Bennée
2024-03-01 10:47 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] contrib/plugins/hotblocks: " Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 10:54 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-27 11:09 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-27 14:26 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-28 8:04 ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2024-02-29 14:33 ` Alex Bennée
2024-03-01 13:21 ` Luc Michel
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] contrib/plugins/howvec: " Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-29 14:35 ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-29 14:40 ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] plugins: remove non per_vcpu inline operation from API Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-29 14:41 ` Alex Bennée
2024-02-26 9:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] plugins: cleanup codepath for previous inline operation Pierrick Bouvier
2024-02-29 14:42 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68b1dff0-13db-4ad0-a1b0-a85991fb3374@linaro.org \
--to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=erdnaxe@crans.org \
--cc=luc.michel@amd.com \
--cc=ma.mandourr@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).