qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!!
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 23:26:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68d4742a-bcc4-df26-41d0-ece75eea58e0@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFn=p-bsY_QWNoRWp928_dwmNyXXcDQ7Bi+0P9ObAsxGTYyiBA@mail.gmail.com>

06.12.2021 21:37, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 7:22 AM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com <mailto:vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all!
> 
>     Finally, I can not stand it any longer. So, I'm happy to present
>     multiprocessing support for iotests test runner.
> 
>     testing on tmpfs:
> 
>     Before:
> 
>     time check -qcow2
>     ...
>     real    12m28.095s
>     user    9m53.398s
>     sys     2m55.548s
> 
>     After:
> 
>     time check -qcow2 -j 12
>     ...
>     real    2m12.136s
>     user    12m40.948s
>     sys     4m7.449s
> 
> 
> VERY excellent. And this will probably flush a lot more bugs loose, too. (Which I consider a good thing!)

Thanks!)

> We could look into utilizing it for 'make check', but we'll have to be prepared for a greater risk of race conditions on the CI if we do. But... it's seriously hard to argue with this kind of optimization, very well done!

I thought about this too. I think, we can at least passthrought -j flag of "make -j9 check" to ./check

I think, CIs mostly call make check without -j flag. But I always call make -j9 check. And it always upset me that all tests run in parallel except for iotests. So if it possible to detect that we are called through "make -j9 check" and use "-j 9" for iotests/check in this case, it would be good.

> 
> 
>     Hmm, seems -j 6 should be enough. I have 6 cores, 2 threads per core.
>     Anyway, that's so fast!
> 
>     Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (3):
>        iotests/testrunner.py: add doc string for run_test()
>        iotests/testrunner.py: move updating last_elapsed to run_tests
>        iotests: check: multiprocessing support
> 
>       tests/qemu-iotests/check         |  4 +-
>       tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>       2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
>     -- 
>     2.31.1
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 12:22 [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] iotests/testrunner.py: add doc string for run_test() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:52   ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:12   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:40     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] iotests/testrunner.py: move updating last_elapsed to run_tests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 17:59   ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:25     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:47       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 20:05         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-03 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] iotests: check: multiprocessing support Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 18:35   ` John Snow
2021-12-06 20:20     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-06 21:00       ` John Snow
2021-12-10 14:36   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-10 14:46     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-12-10 16:26       ` Kevin Wolf
2021-12-06 18:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] iotests: multiprocessing!! John Snow
2021-12-06 20:26   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-12-07 18:20     ` John Snow
2021-12-09 14:33 ` Hanna Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68d4742a-bcc4-df26-41d0-ece75eea58e0@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).