Re: [PATCH 2/2] plugins: Fix two resource leaks in connect_socket()

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 17/11/2020 12.35, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2020/11/17 0:50, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 28/10/2020 14.45, AlexChen wrote:
>>>> Either accept() fails or exits normally, we need to close the fd.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AlexChen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  contrib/plugins/lockstep.c | 2 ++
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/contrib/plugins/lockstep.c b/contrib/plugins/lockstep.c
>>>> index 319bd44b83..5aad50869d 100644
>>>> --- a/contrib/plugins/lockstep.c
>>>> +++ b/contrib/plugins/lockstep.c
>>>> @@ -268,11 +268,13 @@ static bool setup_socket(const char *path)
>>>>      socket_fd = accept(fd, NULL, NULL);
>>>
>>> I think you could also simply close(fd) here instead, then you don't have to
>>> do it twice below.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Thomas and Alex,
>> Thanks for your suggestion. It's a simple and effective solution.
>> Considering that the patch v3 has been queued by Alex Bennée,
>> May I modify this patch and then send patch v4?
> 
> The fix has already been merged so a fresh patch would make more sense.

Well, then never mind. It's not worth the code churn to just get rid of one
line of code, I think.

 Thomas