From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab: remove unreliable avocado CI jobs
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:43:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6996928d-5869-241b-9d5c-25282b9f36ab@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27e38912-0bad-7398-dda6-1670fc644f74@redhat.com>
On 12/9/23 21:58, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 12/09/2023 17.06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> The avocado-system-alpine, avocado-system-fedora, and
>> avocado-system-ubuntu jobs are unreliable. I identified them while
>> looking over CI failures from the past week:
>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5058610614
>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5058610654
>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5030428571
>>
>> Thomas Huth suggest on IRC today that there may be a legitimate failure
>> in there:
>>
>> th_huth: f4bug, yes, seems like it does not start at all correctly on
>> alpine anymore ... and it's broken since ~ 2 weeks already, so if
>> nobody
>> noticed this by now, this is worrying
>>
>> It crept in because the jobs were already unreliable.
>>
>> I don't know how to interpret the job output, so all I can do is to
>> propose removing these jobs. A useful CI job has two outcomes: pass or
>> fail. Timeouts and other in-between states are not useful because they
>> require constant triaging by someone who understands the details of the
>> tests and they can occur when run against pull requests that have
>> nothing to do with the area covered by the test.
>>
>> Hopefully test owners will be able to identify the root causes and solve
>> them so that these jobs can stay. In their current state the jobs are
>> not useful since I cannot cannot tell whether job failures are real or
>> just intermittent when merging qemu.git pull requests.
>>
>> If you are a test owner, please take a look.
>>
>> It is likely that other avocado-system-* CI jobs have similar failures
>> from time to time, but I'll leave them as long as they are passing.
>>
>> Buglink: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1884
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml | 27 ---------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
>> index aee9101507..83ce448c4d 100644
>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
>> @@ -22,15 +22,6 @@ check-system-alpine:
>> IMAGE: alpine
>> MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-unit check-qtest
>> -avocado-system-alpine:
>> - extends: .avocado_test_job_template
>> - needs:
>> - - job: build-system-alpine
>> - artifacts: true
>> - variables:
>> - IMAGE: alpine
>> - MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-avocado
>
> Please don't remove the whole job! Just disable the failing tests within
> the job, e.g.:
>
> diff --git a/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
> b/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
> --- a/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
> +++ b/tests/avocado/replay_kernel.py
> @@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ def do_test_mips_malta32el_nanomips(self,
> kernel_path_xz):
> console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % kernel_command_line
> self.run_rr(kernel_path, kernel_command_line, console_pattern,
> shift=5)
>
> + @skipIf(os.getenv('GITLAB_CI'), 'Skipping unstable test on GitLab')
Better:
@skipUntil(gitlab_issue_resolved(1884))
(joking)
I'll send a patch, smth like:
@skipIf(os.getenv('GITLAB_CI'), 'Pending
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1884')
> def test_mips_malta32el_nanomips_4k(self):
> """
> :avocado: tags=arch:mipsel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 15:06 [PATCH] gitlab: remove unreliable avocado CI jobs Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 15:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-12 16:01 ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-12 16:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-12 16:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 17:39 ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-12 18:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 19:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-13 6:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-09-13 9:18 ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-13 9:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-13 10:35 ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-13 10:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6996928d-5869-241b-9d5c-25282b9f36ab@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).