From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buddi-0005LA-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:53:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1budde-0007UA-0J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:53:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buddd-0007Ty-Q5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:53:25 -0400 References: <1476193521-29034-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <5359ead6-106d-31f3-f71b-681e926c32a3@redhat.com> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Message-ID: <69a4ac90-281e-d934-5a09-a474fc893d6e@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:53:20 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Laszlo Ersek , peter.maydell@linaro.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: drjones@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, abologna@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com On 10/13/2016 12:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/10/2016 11:11, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time >> was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by >> eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10]. >> >> The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in >> message header > > You have an "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com address that > looks seriously invalid. :) > Yes, I saw that - we have 2 lucky people not spammed (yet), but sadly is uncorrelated with the issue in hand. Thanks, Marcel > Paolo >