From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>,
Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] nvme: fix pci doorbell size calculation
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:39:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69e5bb5700bf80bf90e5533f57361c9f30a88cb9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6570b2a5-7173-38f9-725d-394c0e5dac8d@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 15:13 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/15/20 3:01 PM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> >
> > The size of the BAR is 0x1000 (main registers) + 8 bytes for each
> > queue. Currently, the size of the BAR is calculated like so:
> >
> > n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1004 + 2 * (n->num_queues + 1) * 4);
> >
> > Since the 'num_queues' parameter already accounts for the admin queue,
> > this should in any case not need to be incremented by one. Also, the
> > size should be initialized to (0x1000).
> >
> > n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1000 + 2 * n->num_queues * 4);
> >
> > This, with the default value of num_queues (64), we will set aside room
> > for 1 admin queue and 63 I/O queues (4 bytes per doorbell, 2 doorbells
> > per queue).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/block/nvme.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > index d28335cbf377..5b5f75c9d29e 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> > #include "trace.h"
> > #include "nvme.h"
> >
> > +#define NVME_REG_SIZE 0x1000
> > +#define NVME_DB_SIZE 4
> > +
> > #define NVME_GUEST_ERR(trace, fmt, ...) \
> > do { \
> > (trace_##trace)(__VA_ARGS__); \
> > @@ -1345,7 +1348,9 @@ static void nvme_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
> > pcie_endpoint_cap_init(pci_dev, 0x80);
> >
> > n->num_namespaces = 1;
> > - n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1004 + 2 * (n->num_queues + 1) * 4);
> > +
> > + /* num_queues is really number of pairs, so each has two doorbells */
> > + n->reg_size = pow2ceil(NVME_REG_SIZE + 2 * n->num_queues * NVME_DB_SIZE);
>
> Unrelated to this change, but it would be cleaner to initialize reg_size
> using MAX_NUM_QUEUES, then in the I/O handler log GUEST_ERROR when
> registers > n->num_queues accessed. This would model closer to the hardware.
Agree.
Also keep in mind that NVME_DB_SIZE is configurable by setting the doorbell stride.
(but this is optional, so currently this code is OK)
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
>
> > n->ns_size = bs_size / (uint64_t)n->num_namespaces;
> >
> > n->namespaces = g_new0(NvmeNamespace, n->num_namespaces);
> >
>
>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-15 13:01 [PATCH v2 00/16] nvme: refactoring and cleanups Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] nvme: fix pci doorbell size calculation Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 9:39 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] nvme: rename trace events to pci_nvme Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 9:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] nvme: remove superfluous breaks Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] nvme: move device parameters to separate struct Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] nvme: use constants in identify Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] nvme: refactor nvme_addr_read Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 10:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] nvme: remove redundant cmbloc/cmbsz members Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 12:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] nvme: factor out property/constraint checks Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 14:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] nvme: factor out device state setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 14:55 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] nvme: factor out block backend setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:04 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] nvme: add namespace helpers Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] nvme: factor out namespace setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-15 13:20 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-15 13:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-16 6:03 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-24 10:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:57 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] nvme: factor out pci setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] nvme: factor out cmb setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 16:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] nvme: factor out controller identify setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 16:17 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] nvme: refactoring and cleanups no-reply
2020-04-20 5:14 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-20 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2020-04-21 6:38 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-21 15:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-21 16:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-22 6:19 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69e5bb5700bf80bf90e5533f57361c9f30a88cb9.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@linaro.org \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).