qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@linaro.org>,
	Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] nvme: fix pci doorbell size calculation
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:39:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69e5bb5700bf80bf90e5533f57361c9f30a88cb9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6570b2a5-7173-38f9-725d-394c0e5dac8d@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 15:13 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/15/20 3:01 PM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > 
> > The size of the BAR is 0x1000 (main registers) + 8 bytes for each
> > queue. Currently, the size of the BAR is calculated like so:
> > 
> >      n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1004 + 2 * (n->num_queues + 1) * 4);
> > 
> > Since the 'num_queues' parameter already accounts for the admin queue,
> > this should in any case not need to be incremented by one. Also, the
> > size should be initialized to (0x1000).
> > 
> >      n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1000 + 2 * n->num_queues * 4);
> > 
> > This, with the default value of num_queues (64), we will set aside room
> > for 1 admin queue and 63 I/O queues (4 bytes per doorbell, 2 doorbells
> > per queue).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/block/nvme.c | 7 ++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > index d28335cbf377..5b5f75c9d29e 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> >   #include "trace.h"
> >   #include "nvme.h"
> >   
> > +#define NVME_REG_SIZE 0x1000
> > +#define NVME_DB_SIZE  4
> > +
> >   #define NVME_GUEST_ERR(trace, fmt, ...) \
> >       do { \
> >           (trace_##trace)(__VA_ARGS__); \
> > @@ -1345,7 +1348,9 @@ static void nvme_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
> >       pcie_endpoint_cap_init(pci_dev, 0x80);
> >   
> >       n->num_namespaces = 1;
> > -    n->reg_size = pow2ceil(0x1004 + 2 * (n->num_queues + 1) * 4);
> > +
> > +    /* num_queues is really number of pairs, so each has two doorbells */
> > +    n->reg_size = pow2ceil(NVME_REG_SIZE + 2 * n->num_queues * NVME_DB_SIZE);
> 
> Unrelated to this change, but it would be cleaner to initialize reg_size 
> using MAX_NUM_QUEUES, then in the I/O handler log GUEST_ERROR when 
> registers > n->num_queues accessed. This would model closer to the hardware.
Agree.

Also keep in mind that NVME_DB_SIZE is configurable by setting the doorbell stride.
(but this is optional, so currently this code is OK)

Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

> 
> >       n->ns_size = bs_size / (uint64_t)n->num_namespaces;
> >   
> >       n->namespaces = g_new0(NvmeNamespace, n->num_namespaces);
> > 
> 
> 


Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky




  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 13:01 [PATCH v2 00/16] nvme: refactoring and cleanups Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] nvme: fix pci doorbell size calculation Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:13   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21  9:39     ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] nvme: rename trace events to pci_nvme Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:04   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21  9:43   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] nvme: remove superfluous breaks Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] nvme: move device parameters to separate struct Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] nvme: use constants in identify Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] nvme: refactor nvme_addr_read Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 10:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] nvme: add max_ioqpairs device parameter Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] nvme: remove redundant cmbloc/cmbsz members Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 12:05   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] nvme: factor out property/constraint checks Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:08   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 14:53   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] nvme: factor out device state setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 14:55   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] nvme: factor out block backend setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:08   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:04   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] nvme: add namespace helpers Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:09   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:41   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] nvme: factor out namespace setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:16   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-15 13:20     ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-15 13:26       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-16  6:03         ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-24 10:13           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:57   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] nvme: factor out pci setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:14   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 15:59   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] nvme: factor out cmb setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-21 16:10   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] nvme: factor out controller identify setup Klaus Jensen
2020-04-15 13:06   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-04-21 16:17   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-15 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] nvme: refactoring and cleanups no-reply
2020-04-20  5:14 ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-20 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2020-04-21  6:38   ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen
2020-04-21 15:47     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-21 16:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-04-22  6:19   ` Klaus Birkelund Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69e5bb5700bf80bf90e5533f57361c9f30a88cb9.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=beata.michalska@linaro.org \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).