From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
alex.bennee@linaro.org, maz@kernel.org, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
julien@xen.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/18] hw/arm/smmu-common: Add support for nested TLB
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:20:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b41c718-7e02-4a3d-adf8-a56306ab68d9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZkYkTgDztEyX6GT_@google.com>
Hi Mostafa,
On 5/16/24 17:20, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Mostafa,
>>
>> On 4/29/24 05:23, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for nested(combined) TLB entries.
>> space between nested and (.
> Will do.
>>> The main function combine_tlb() is not used here but in the next
>>> patches, but to simplify the patches it is introduced first.
>>>
>>> Main changes:
>>> 1) New entry added in the TLB, parent_perm, for nested TLB, holds the
>> s/entry/field, s/TLB/SMMUTLBEntry struct
> Will do.
>>> stage-2 permission, this can be used to know the origin of a
>>> permission fault from a cached entry as caching the “and” of the
>>> permissions loses this information.
>>>
>>> SMMUPTWEventInfo is used to hold information about PTW faults so
>>> the event can be populated, the value of stage (which maps to S2
>>> in the event) used to be set based on the current stage for TLB
>> I don't understand "(which maps to S2 in the event)". What do you mean?
>> This could be S1 or S2 depending on the active stage, no?
> Not really, if the IPA size is larger than S2 input size, this is
> considered stage-1 fault.
>
> For TLB permission fault, yes, that is how it is decided.
> However, with nesting, a permission fault from a cached entry can be
> from a stage-1 or stage-2, that’s why we now cache both and not just
> the combined permission, and the logic to set fault stage is modified
> accordingly.
I meant in smmu_translate() we initially had for permission fault
info->stage = cfg->stage whcih can be S1 or S2. Hence the fact I do not
understand the sentence
the value of stage (which maps to S2 in the event)
I understand that with nested this computation needs to change because the permission can be linked to either the S1 or S2 stage.
Maybe that's just a matter or rephrasing?
>>> permission faults, however with the parent_perm, it is now set
>>> based on which perm has the missing permission
>>>
>>> When nesting is not enabled it has the same value as perm which
>>> doesn't change the logic.
>>>
>>> 2) As combined TLB implementation is used, the combination logic
>>> chooses:
>>> - tg and level from the entry which has the smallest addr_mask.
>> tbh I am scared bout swapping s1/s2 tg and level. In smmu_iotlb_lookup()
>> I see tt->granule_sz being used which is s1 data. I mean it is not
>> obvious to me this is correct. Could you maybe give more explanations
>> detailing why/how this is guaranted to work.
> As you mentioned the next patch reworks the lookup logic, I can reorder
> the 2 patches if that is better, please let me know what you think?
Yes if you manage to reorder that may be more logical because otherwise
it looks incorrect.
>
>> Can you give additional details about what s1+s2 combinations were tested?
> I tested with S1 and S2 4K pages
> S1 level = 3 and S2 level = 3
> S1 level = 2 and S2 level = 3
> S1 level = 3 and S2 level = 2
> S1 level = 1 and S2 level = 2
>
> And also tested with with S1 64K granule and S2 4K.
OK, I would suggest you mention that in the coverletter because it is
reassuring and the combination is not totally obvious - at least to me ;-) -
Eric
>
>>> - Based on that the iova that would be cached is recalculated.
>>> - Translated_addr is chosen from stage-2.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/arm/smmu-common.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> index 21982621c0..0d6945fa54 100644
>>> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
>>> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int smmu_ptw_64_s1(SMMUTransCfg *cfg,
>>> tlbe->entry.translated_addr = gpa;
>>> tlbe->entry.iova = iova & ~mask;
>>> tlbe->entry.addr_mask = mask;
>>> - tlbe->entry.perm = PTE_AP_TO_PERM(ap);
>>> + tlbe->parent_perm = tlbe->entry.perm = PTE_AP_TO_PERM(ap);
>> nit: I would prefer on separate lines.
> Will do.
>
>>> tlbe->level = level;
>>> tlbe->granule = granule_sz;
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int smmu_ptw_64_s2(SMMUTransCfg *cfg,
>>> tlbe->entry.translated_addr = gpa;
>>> tlbe->entry.iova = ipa & ~mask;
>>> tlbe->entry.addr_mask = mask;
>>> - tlbe->entry.perm = s2ap;
>>> + tlbe->parent_perm = tlbe->entry.perm = s2ap;
>>> tlbe->level = level;
>>> tlbe->granule = granule_sz;
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -530,6 +530,27 @@ error:
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* combine 2 TLB entries and return in tlbe in nested config. */
>> suggestion: combine S1 and S2 TLB entries into a single entry. As a
>> result the S1 entry is overriden with combined data.
> Will do.
>
>>> +static void __attribute__((unused)) combine_tlb(SMMUTLBEntry *tlbe,
>>> + SMMUTLBEntry *tlbe_s2,
>>> + dma_addr_t iova,
>>> + SMMUTransCfg *cfg)
>>> +{
>>> + if (tlbe_s2->entry.addr_mask < tlbe->entry.addr_mask) {
>>> + tlbe->entry.addr_mask = tlbe_s2->entry.addr_mask;
>>> + tlbe->granule = tlbe_s2->granule;
>>> + tlbe->level = tlbe_s2->level;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + tlbe->entry.translated_addr = CACHED_ENTRY_TO_ADDR(tlbe_s2,
>>> + tlbe->entry.translated_addr);
>>> +
>>> + tlbe->entry.iova = iova & ~tlbe->entry.addr_mask;
>>> + /* parent_perm has s2 perm while perm has s1 perm. */
>> suggestion: while perm keeps s1 perm.
>>
> Will do.
>
> Thanks,
> Mostafa
>>> + tlbe->parent_perm = tlbe_s2->entry.perm;
>>> + return;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * smmu_ptw - Walk the page tables for an IOVA, according to @cfg
>>> *
>>> @@ -607,9 +628,12 @@ SMMUTLBEntry *smmu_translate(SMMUState *bs, SMMUTransCfg *cfg, dma_addr_t addr,
>>>
>>> cached_entry = smmu_iotlb_lookup(bs, cfg, &tt_combined, aligned_addr);
>>> if (cached_entry) {
>>> - if ((flag & IOMMU_WO) && !(cached_entry->entry.perm & IOMMU_WO)) {
>>> + if ((flag & IOMMU_WO) && !(cached_entry->entry.perm &
>>> + cached_entry->parent_perm & IOMMU_WO)) {
>>> info->type = SMMU_PTW_ERR_PERMISSION;
>>> - info->stage = cfg->stage;
>>> + info->stage = !(cached_entry->entry.perm & IOMMU_WO) ?
>>> + SMMU_STAGE_1 :
>>> + SMMU_STAGE_2;
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>> return cached_entry;
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>>> index 09d3b9e734..1db566d451 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ typedef struct SMMUTLBEntry {
>>> IOMMUTLBEntry entry;
>>> uint8_t level;
>>> uint8_t granule;
>>> + IOMMUAccessFlags parent_perm;
>>> } SMMUTLBEntry;
>>>
>>> /* Stage-2 configuration. */
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 3:23 [RFC PATCH v3 00/18] SMMUv3 nested translation support Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/18] hw/arm/smmu-common: Add missing size check for stage-1 Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-13 11:30 ` Eric Auger
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/18] hw/arm/smmu: Fix IPA for stage-2 events Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-13 11:47 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-16 14:43 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Fix encoding of CLASS in events Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 12:27 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-16 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/18] hw/arm/smmu: Use enum for SMMU stage Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 20:25 ` Alex Bennée
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/18] hw/arm/smmu: Split smmuv3_translate() Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/18] hw/arm/smmu: Consolidate ASID and VMID types Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 12:41 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 14:55 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Translate CD and TT using stage-2 table Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 13:15 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-16 16:11 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/18] hw/arm/smmu-common: Add support for nested TLB Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 13:48 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-16 15:20 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 8:20 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2024-05-22 12:44 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-06-17 14:56 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/18] hw/arm/smmu-common: Rework TLB lookup for nesting Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-15 13:54 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-16 15:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 8:27 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-22 12:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/18] hw/arm/smmu-common: Support nested translation Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 9:48 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 14:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/18] hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in smmuv3_range_inval() Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/18] hw/arm/smmu: Support nesting in the rest of commands Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 10:24 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 14:58 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Support nested SMMUs in smmuv3_notify_iova() Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 10:37 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 15:02 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Support and advertise nesting Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 13:16 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 15:03 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Advertise S2FWB Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 13:30 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-17 15:04 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/18] hw/arm/smmu: Refactor SMMU OAS Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-20 13:59 ` Eric Auger
2024-04-29 3:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/18] hw/arm/smmuv3: Add property for OAS Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-21 9:32 ` Eric Auger
2024-06-27 11:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 3:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/18] hw/arm/virt: Set SMMU OAS based on CPU PARANGE Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-21 9:43 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-24 17:22 ` Julien Grall
2024-06-27 11:44 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-05-13 13:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/18] SMMUv3 nested translation support Julien Grall
2024-05-21 9:47 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-27 16:12 ` Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b41c718-7e02-4a3d-adf8-a56306ab68d9@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).