From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5C4y-0002qy-8k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:45:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5C4t-0000x8-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:45:48 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:51604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5C4t-0000wd-4R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:45:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9JEjXs7100456 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:45:39 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dpx2m82jq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:45:36 -0400 Received: from localhost by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:45:01 -0600 References: <20171009225623.29232-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <523bf8e7-0be0-0db9-83da-4e7d7449562f@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <969297048.30042590.1508423615378.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Stefan Berger Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:44:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <969297048.30042590.1508423615378.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Message-Id: <6b6eb9ff-b9de-7480-3f0d-ee2e7b5ab3b1@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/42] TPM: code cleanup & CRB device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= Cc: amarnath valluri , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/19/2017 10:33 AM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi Stefan > > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 10/09/2017 06:55 PM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I accumulated a series of patch doing some TPM code cleanup while >>> doing review. I removed some dead code, simplified other parts, and >>> tried to isolate implementation of the backend and frontend by using = a >>> new TPMIf interface. I solved a few issues, and added some FIXME for >>> what should be tackled. Finally, I implemented a simple CRB device >>> (tpm 2.0) that is work in progress for now - it works fine with >>> passthrough, but swtpm/libtpms with win10 has some issues that need >>> more investigations. >>> >>> seabios CRB support is required for TPM 2.0 & emulation >>> (https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/seabios/2017-October/011839.html= ) >>> >>> Comments/review welcome! >> Are you going to post a v2 soon? > I was wondering if you would take the patches that you already reviewed= for the next pull request. That way v2 would be smaller. I'll take them up to 21/42. Stefan