From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAEi6-0008EI-9E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:02:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAEi0-0004UF-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:02:46 -0400 Received: from 6.mo69.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.50.107]:49734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAEi0-0004Tj-Iy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:02:40 -0400 Received: from player699.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo69.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304C81F2C6 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 14:02:39 +0200 (CEST) References: <149484833874.20089.4164801378197848306.stgit@bahia.lan> <149484839512.20089.2730407279712230463.stgit@bahia.lan> From: =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= Message-ID: <6bbb2627-c360-289f-039d-2b899e2e6d9c@kaod.org> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:02:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <149484839512.20089.2730407279712230463.stgit@bahia.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] spapr-cpu-core: release ICP object when realization fails List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Kurz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Bharata B Rao , David Gibson On 05/15/2017 01:39 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: > While here we introduce a single error path to avoid code duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz > --- > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > index 4389ef4c2aef..63d160f7e010 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > @@ -147,25 +147,25 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize_child(Object *child, Error **errp) > object_property_add_const_link(obj, "xics", OBJECT(spapr), &error_abort); > object_property_set_bool(obj, true, "realized", &local_err); > if (local_err) { > - error_propagate(errp, local_err); > - return; > + goto error; the error: statement below adds an object_unparent(). is that ok ? C. > } > > object_property_set_bool(child, true, "realized", &local_err); > if (local_err) { > - object_unparent(obj); > - error_propagate(errp, local_err); > - return; > + goto error; > } > > spapr_cpu_init(spapr, cpu, &local_err); > if (local_err) { > - object_unparent(obj); > - error_propagate(errp, local_err); > - return; > + goto error; > } > > xics_cpu_setup(XICS_FABRIC(spapr), cpu, ICP(obj)); > + return; > + > +error: > + object_unparent(obj); > + error_propagate(errp, local_err); > } > > static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) >