From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 2/4] coroutine: abort if we try to schedule or enter a pending coroutine
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6be1cc3c-9f12-e560-f3f8-bb5072f75719@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171121134754.GB11073@localhost.localdomain>
On 21/11/2017 14:47, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 21.11.2017 um 03:23 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>> The previous patch fixed a race condition, in which there were
>> coroutines being executing doubly, or after coroutine deletion.
>>
>> We can detect common scenarios when this happens, and print an error
>> message and abort before we corrupt memory / data, or segfault.
>>
>> This patch will abort if an attempt to enter a coroutine is made while
>> it is currently pending execution, either in a specific AioContext bh,
>> or pending execution via a timer. It will also abort if a coroutine
>> is scheduled, before a prior scheduled run has occured.
>>
>> We cannot rely on the existing co->caller check for recursive re-entry
>> to catch this, as the coroutine may run and exit with
>> COROUTINE_TERMINATE before the scheduled coroutine executes.
>>
>> (This is the scenario that was occuring and fixed in the previous
>> patch).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> include/qemu/coroutine_int.h | 6 ++++++
>> util/async.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> util/qemu-coroutine-sleep.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> util/qemu-coroutine.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> index cb98892..56e4c48 100644
>> --- a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> +++ b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ struct Coroutine {
>>
>> /* Only used when the coroutine has yielded. */
>> AioContext *ctx;
>> +
>> + /* Used to catch and abort on illegal co-routine entry.
>> + * Will contain the name of the function that had first
>> + * scheduled the coroutine. */
>> + const char *scheduled;
>
> Not sure if it makes any difference in practice, but I just want to
> mention that the new field is right after a cacheline boundary and
> the only field that is used in qemu_aio_coroutine_enter() and accesses
> this second cacheline.
>
> I'm not paying much attention to this kind of thing in most contexts,
> but entering a coroutine is a hot path that we want to be fast, so maybe
> it's worth having a second look.
Makes sense! Since co_queue_wakeup is used on *yield*, maybe the order
should be: ctx, scheduled, co_queue_next, co_queue_wakeup,
co_scheduled_next.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 2:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 0/4] Fix segfault in blockjob race condition Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 1/4] blockjob: do not allow coroutine double entry or entry-after-completion Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 10:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-21 13:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-21 13:26 ` Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 2/4] coroutine: abort if we try to schedule or enter a pending coroutine Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 10:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-21 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-21 12:20 ` Eric Blake
2017-11-21 13:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-21 15:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-11-21 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 3/4] qemu-iotests: add option in common.qemu for mismatch only Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 4/4] qemu-iotest: add test for blockjob coroutine race condition Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6be1cc3c-9f12-e560-f3f8-bb5072f75719@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).