qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 2/4] coroutine: abort if we try to schedule or enter a pending coroutine
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:11:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6be1cc3c-9f12-e560-f3f8-bb5072f75719@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171121134754.GB11073@localhost.localdomain>

On 21/11/2017 14:47, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 21.11.2017 um 03:23 hat Jeff Cody geschrieben:
>> The previous patch fixed a race condition, in which there were
>> coroutines being executing doubly, or after coroutine deletion.
>>
>> We can detect common scenarios when this happens, and print an error
>> message and abort before we corrupt memory / data, or segfault.
>>
>> This patch will abort if an attempt to enter a coroutine is made while
>> it is currently pending execution, either in a specific AioContext bh,
>> or pending execution via a timer.  It will also abort if a coroutine
>> is scheduled, before a prior scheduled run has occured.
>>
>> We cannot rely on the existing co->caller check for recursive re-entry
>> to catch this, as the coroutine may run and exit with
>> COROUTINE_TERMINATE before the scheduled coroutine executes.
>>
>> (This is the scenario that was occuring and fixed in the previous
>> patch).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  include/qemu/coroutine_int.h |  6 ++++++
>>  util/async.c                 | 11 +++++++++++
>>  util/qemu-coroutine-sleep.c  | 11 +++++++++++
>>  util/qemu-coroutine.c        | 11 +++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> index cb98892..56e4c48 100644
>> --- a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> +++ b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
>> @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ struct Coroutine {
>>  
>>      /* Only used when the coroutine has yielded.  */
>>      AioContext *ctx;
>> +
>> +    /* Used to catch and abort on illegal co-routine entry.
>> +     * Will contain the name of the function that had first
>> +     * scheduled the coroutine. */
>> +    const char *scheduled;
> 
> Not sure if it makes any difference in practice, but I just want to
> mention that the new field is right after a cacheline boundary and
> the only field that is used in qemu_aio_coroutine_enter() and accesses
> this second cacheline.
> 
> I'm not paying much attention to this kind of thing in most contexts,
> but entering a coroutine is a hot path that we want to be fast, so maybe
> it's worth having a second look.

Makes sense!  Since co_queue_wakeup is used on *yield*, maybe the order
should be: ctx, scheduled, co_queue_next, co_queue_wakeup,
co_scheduled_next.

Thanks,

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-21 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21  2:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 0/4] Fix segfault in blockjob race condition Jeff Cody
2017-11-21  2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 1/4] blockjob: do not allow coroutine double entry or entry-after-completion Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 10:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-21 13:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-21 13:26       ` Jeff Cody
2017-11-21  2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 2/4] coroutine: abort if we try to schedule or enter a pending coroutine Jeff Cody
2017-11-21 10:59   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-21 13:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-21 12:20   ` Eric Blake
2017-11-21 13:47   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-21 15:11     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-11-21  2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 3/4] qemu-iotests: add option in common.qemu for mismatch only Jeff Cody
2017-11-21  2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.11 4/4] qemu-iotest: add test for blockjob coroutine race condition Jeff Cody

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6be1cc3c-9f12-e560-f3f8-bb5072f75719@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).