From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664EC388F7 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901DE206E9 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 14:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="g1fUHcWB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 901DE206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58276 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYsM5-0000mv-N4 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:59:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYsKo-0008RY-Dh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:58:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:46743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYsKj-0004xN-59 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:58:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604156300; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H6/TIwrKN199Hqu/RMOB5UcPBufI+HtrWBOUpNDaYN4=; b=g1fUHcWBQr+5gi2E/f5zmwIxMIfGI7WAHAfzvsSRA6CIjU1Y7SKgU5nFha7ayWYqA+QtgP Lk2gC+ym1rFaAskCj+LcXceDEc+vpXXkF3OQn8kbUrVpPFXyF/8Xoc6Yff+KvwAaV5qRd8 0RGv9Y5h2XkmgF42YxhJ9yRJGor1Dck= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-201-Ar1ps6ZDMHSMDKD_xj8a7A-1; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:58:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ar1ps6ZDMHSMDKD_xj8a7A-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id t14so4124338wrs.2 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H6/TIwrKN199Hqu/RMOB5UcPBufI+HtrWBOUpNDaYN4=; b=P68LnE77xjHxyrzLdTxJix5X0eGf2v9slf70DlPJWEiOUwWvCISc8HI5W88sDUDzgj VdYpVrUgNWMXUp3wb7FO7ex7cfVm7bYThKLWsIc3BjWhkVB5wUxvuLIMa3RUuPWBkJ8w mPMRmNvdI11NulvgAiYkZfkCfnQ2yRnpiT9lab38mPZovY/JLdn4Cu4AGDo2PlYvAtps K6Ig09b5ozg4c1ch5UriDIQ0k9ffP4+sf9h6udNJicR1RluWtg4G90kVpDjhAJVLcp/4 OhsZzUPexSZ0Q26CpriKbTTs1wqCJV1EtO+nU2D8M4RnA/mRDTgRmT7YC/vNrPBBRJO8 ohuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sdkqLTgAs6f6nL7RMD6/TmTnXh7HuH/OUwE92eww3NqArD0hP mNi1XagYEJscatM34wDgvks4VyzZ/P85Rkehjy496NzO0uIIgtPv7VdnHncJ+hQtdfYLG/UiFPj elMqruAfaqsoM23I= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6086:: with SMTP id w6mr9414265wrt.231.1604156296878; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwawXjzI26XmUjmv4hlTDs4nBsjRBNz+ALvRVYCuStI1XmaCad2auE6nxf6RniCSWOgy+pedg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6086:: with SMTP id w6mr9414256wrt.231.1604156296728; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.64] ([151.20.250.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm8470173wmh.10.2020.10.31.07.58.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] docs: Fix building with Sphinx 3.2 To: Peter Maydell References: <20201030174700.7204-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <7ef49ead-40e1-1705-afc3-e94cac2bf5c9@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <6c1bf7ce-1bfa-ec49-8b9c-098c2a0bf37c@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 15:58:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/31 08:00:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.257, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P_=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , QEMU Developers , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 30/10/20 21:02, Peter Maydell wrote: > Having actually looked at the current state of the kernel's > kernel-doc script I see somebody has already done the > necessary updates for Sphinx 3 compatibility. So we have > two choices for 5.2: > * take this patch 1 as a minimal fix > * do the sync of the kernel's version of the script > > I'll have a look at how painful or otherwise the sync is, I guess. > We only use the kerneldoc stuff in the 'devel' manual which > is not really userfacing anyway. Oh nice! I had a slightly older Linux checkout and it wasn't there yet. I think you can go ahead with these two patches, I'll take care of the sync for 6.0. Here are our two patches. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201030144713.201372-1-pbonzini@redhat.com/T/#t