qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:53:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c548cdd-f8c5-20a3-cce2-101e2f4436b0@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127180840.11937-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>



On 27/11/2019 21:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Currently, block_copy operation lock the whole requested region. But
> there is no reason to lock clusters, which are already copied, it will
> disturb other parallel block_copy requests for no reason.
> 
> Let's instead do the following:
> 
> Lock only sub-region, which we are going to operate on. Then, after
> copying all dirty sub-regions, we should wait for intersecting
> requests block-copy, if they failed, we should retry these new dirty
> clusters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   block/block-copy.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
> index 20068cd699..aca44b13fb 100644
> --- a/block/block-copy.c
> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
> @@ -39,29 +39,62 @@ static BlockCopyInFlightReq *block_copy_find_inflight_req(BlockCopyState *s,
>       return NULL;
>   }
>   
> -static void coroutine_fn block_copy_wait_inflight_reqs(BlockCopyState *s,
> -                                                       int64_t offset,
> -                                                       int64_t bytes)
> +/*
> + * If there are no intersecting requests return false. Otherwise, wait for the
> + * first found intersecting request to finish and return true.
> + */
> +static bool coroutine_fn block_copy_wait_one(BlockCopyState *s, int64_t start,
> +                                             int64_t end)
>   {
> -    BlockCopyInFlightReq *req;
> +    BlockCopyInFlightReq *req = block_copy_find_inflight_req(s, start, end);
>   
> -    while ((req = block_copy_find_inflight_req(s, offset, bytes))) {
> -        qemu_co_queue_wait(&req->wait_queue, NULL);
> +    if (!req) {
> +        return false;
>       }
> +
> +    qemu_co_queue_wait(&req->wait_queue, NULL);
> +
> +    return true;
>   }
>   
> +/* Called only on full-dirty region */
>   static void block_copy_inflight_req_begin(BlockCopyState *s,
>                                             BlockCopyInFlightReq *req,
>                                             int64_t offset, int64_t bytes)
>   {
> +    assert(!block_copy_find_inflight_req(s, offset, bytes));
> +
> +    bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, offset, bytes);
> +
>       req->offset = offset;
>       req->bytes = bytes;
>       qemu_co_queue_init(&req->wait_queue);
>       QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s->inflight_reqs, req, list);
>   }
>   
> -static void coroutine_fn block_copy_inflight_req_end(BlockCopyInFlightReq *req)
> +static void coroutine_fn block_copy_inflight_req_shrink(BlockCopyState *s,
> +        BlockCopyInFlightReq *req, int64_t new_bytes)
>   {
> +    if (new_bytes == req->bytes) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    assert(new_bytes > 0 && new_bytes < req->bytes);
> +
> +    bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap,
> +                          req->offset + new_bytes, req->bytes - new_bytes);
> +
> +    req->bytes = new_bytes;
> +    qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&req->wait_queue);
> +}
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn block_copy_inflight_req_end(BlockCopyState *s,
> +                                                     BlockCopyInFlightReq *req,
> +                                                     int ret)

I suggest substituting the 'int ret' parameter with someone like 'bool 
set_dirty' and pass the expression 'ret < 0' as the input parameter in 
calling function. The 'int ret' is used in QEMU as a local return 
variable traditionally.

> +{
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, req->offset, req->bytes);
> +    }
>       QLIST_REMOVE(req, list);
>       qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&req->wait_queue);
>   }
> @@ -344,12 +377,19 @@ int64_t block_copy_reset_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s,
>       return ret;
>   }
>   
> -int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
> -                            int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
> -                            bool *error_is_read)
> +/*
> + * block_copy_dirty_clusters
> + *
> + * Copy dirty clusters in @start/@bytes range.
> + * Returns 1 if dirty clusters found and successfully copied, 0 if no dirty
> + * clusters found and -errno on failure.
> + */
> +static int coroutine_fn block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyState *s,
> +                                                  int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
> +                                                  bool *error_is_read)
>   {
>       int ret = 0;
> -    BlockCopyInFlightReq req;
> +    bool found_dirty = false;
>   
>       /*
>        * block_copy() user is responsible for keeping source and target in same
> @@ -361,10 +401,8 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
>       assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
>       assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
>   
> -    block_copy_wait_inflight_reqs(s, offset, bytes);
> -    block_copy_inflight_req_begin(s, &req, offset, bytes);
> -
>       while (bytes) {
> +        BlockCopyInFlightReq req;
>           int64_t next_zero, cur_bytes, status_bytes;
>   
>           if (!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get(s->copy_bitmap, offset)) {
> @@ -374,6 +412,8 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
>               continue; /* already copied */
>           }
>   
> +        found_dirty = true;
> +
>           cur_bytes = MIN(bytes, s->copy_size);
>   
>           next_zero = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(s->copy_bitmap, offset,
> @@ -383,10 +423,12 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
>               assert(next_zero < offset + cur_bytes); /* no need to do MIN() */
>               cur_bytes = next_zero - offset;
>           }
> +        block_copy_inflight_req_begin(s, &req, offset, cur_bytes);
>   
>           ret = block_copy_block_status(s, offset, cur_bytes, &status_bytes);
> +        block_copy_inflight_req_shrink(s, &req, status_bytes);
>           if (s->skip_unallocated && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED)) {
> -            bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, offset, status_bytes);
> +            block_copy_inflight_req_end(s, &req, 0);
>               s->progress_reset_callback(s->progress_opaque);
>               trace_block_copy_skip_range(s, offset, status_bytes);
>               offset += status_bytes;
> @@ -398,15 +440,13 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
>   
>           trace_block_copy_process(s, offset);
>   
> -        bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, offset, cur_bytes);
> -
>           co_get_from_shres(s->mem, cur_bytes);
>           ret = block_copy_do_copy(s, offset, cur_bytes, ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO,
>                                    error_is_read);
>           co_put_to_shres(s->mem, cur_bytes);
> +        block_copy_inflight_req_end(s, &req, ret);
>           if (ret < 0) {
> -            bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, offset, cur_bytes);
> -            break;
> +            return ret;
>           }
>   
>           s->progress_bytes_callback(cur_bytes, s->progress_opaque);
> @@ -414,7 +454,41 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
>           bytes -= cur_bytes;
>       }
>   
> -    block_copy_inflight_req_end(&req);
> +    return found_dirty;
> +}
>   
> -    return ret;
> +int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s, int64_t start, uint64_t bytes,
> +                            bool *error_is_read)
> +{
> +    while (true) {
> +        int ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(s, start, bytes, error_is_read);
> +
> +        if (ret < 0) {
> +            /*
> +             * IO operation failed, which means the whole block_copy request
> +             * failed.
> +             */
> +            return ret;
> +        }
> +        if (ret) {
> +            /*
> +             * Something was copied, which means that there were yield points
> +             * and some new dirty bits may appered (due to failed parallel
> +             * block-copy requests).
> +             */
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        /*
> +         * Here ret == 0, which means that there is no dirty clusters in
> +         * requested region.
> +         */
> +
> +        if (!block_copy_wait_one(s, start, bytes)) {
> +            /* No dirty bits and nothing to wait: the whole request is done */
> +            break;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
>   }
> 

-- 
With the best regards,
Andrey Shinkevich


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-30 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 18:08 [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] block/block-copy: specialcase first copy_range request Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29  7:38   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-07 17:28   ` Max Reitz
2020-02-08 12:32     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] block/block-copy: use block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29  9:12   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-07 17:46   ` Max Reitz
2020-02-08 12:25     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-02-17 11:48       ` Max Reitz
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] block/block-copy: factor out block_copy_find_inflight_req Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29  9:25   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-07 17:50   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] block/block-copy: refactor interfaces to use bytes instead of end Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29 17:12   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-05 11:36     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-02-07 18:01   ` Max Reitz
2020-02-08 12:55     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29 17:37   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-07 18:04   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-29 20:05   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-01-30 13:45     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-30 16:24       ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-01-30 17:09         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-30 18:00           ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-01-30 15:53   ` Andrey Shinkevich [this message]
2020-01-30 16:05     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-02-17 13:38   ` Max Reitz
2020-02-20  7:21     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-02-20  9:10       ` Max Reitz
2019-11-27 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] block/block-copy: hide structure definitions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-30 18:58   ` Andrey Shinkevich
2020-02-17 14:04   ` Max Reitz
2020-02-20  7:26     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19  9:01 ` [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-01-20  9:09   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-02-07 18:05     ` Max Reitz
2020-02-08 10:28       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c548cdd-f8c5-20a3-cce2-101e2f4436b0@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).