Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs/fuzz: update make and run command lines

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 09/11/2020 12.25, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> After meson and some other build changes the qemu fuzz target should be
> build as:
>   make qemu-fuzz-i386
> And also update the run path command line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> ---
>  docs/devel/fuzzing.txt | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt b/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt
> index 03585c1..590900c 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt
> +++ b/docs/devel/fuzzing.txt
> @@ -32,15 +32,15 @@ such as out-of-bounds accesses, use-after-frees, double-frees etc.
>  
>  Fuzz targets are built similarly to system/softmmu:
>  
> -    make i386-softmmu/fuzz
> +    make qemu-fuzz-i386
>  
> -This builds ./i386-softmmu/qemu-fuzz-i386
> +This builds ./build/qemu-fuzz-i386
>  
>  The first option to this command is: --fuzz-target=FUZZ_NAME
>  To list all of the available fuzzers run qemu-fuzz-i386 with no arguments.
>  
>  For example:
> -    ./i386-softmmu/qemu-fuzz-i386 --fuzz-target=virtio-scsi-fuzz
> +    ./build/qemu-fuzz-i386 --fuzz-target=virtio-scsi-fuzz
>  
>  Internally, libfuzzer parses all arguments that do not begin with "--".
>  Information about these is available by passing -help=1

This conflicts with Alexander's "docs/fuzz: update fuzzing documentation
post-meson" patch ... which one should be used? One is better for people who
do in-tree builds, the other is better for people who do out-of-tree builds
... I'll go with Alexander's version for now for my next pull-request, since
the text in this file says "/path/to/configure" which rather indicate
out-of-tree builds, but in the long run, it would maybe be good to add some
clarifying sentences here...

 Thomas