qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Revert emulator selection to old behaviour
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:40:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cc48ce0-96d0-4ac4-bd5d-d0ebf7325f01@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202145627.GM4168502@redhat.com>

On 2/2/21 3:56 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 2/2/21 3:28 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> If the qemu-system-{arch} binary for the host architecture can't be
>>> found, the old 'check' implementation selected the alphabetically first
>>> system emulator binary that it could find. The new Python implementation
>>> just uses the first result of glob.iglob(), which has an undefined
>>> order.
>>>
>>> This is a problem that breaks CI because the iotests aren't actually
>>> prepared to run on any emulator. They should be, so this is really a bug
>>> in the failing test cases that should be fixed there, but as a quick
>>> fix, let's revert to the old behaviour to let CI runs succeed again.
>>
>> FWIW this is the same problem I had 1 year ago and tried to
>> fix it by sending QMP 'query-version' (introduced in v0.14):
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg675075.html
> 
> In the current failures the issue isn't the version number. Rather some
> of the tests (mistakenly) assume the emulator supports PCI, and we're
> randomly sometimes picking emulator targets that lack PCI.

Then this patch from the same series:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg675088.html

It queries TYPE_DEVICE, but we can query TYPE_PCI_DEVICE too,
which should be selected if a machine have a TYPE_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE
providing a TYPE_PCI_BUS.

Anyway the idea is to query the binary with QMP to see if it makes
sens to run the test with it.

Regards,

Phil.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 14:28 [PATCH] iotests: Revert emulator selection to old behaviour Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 14:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-02 14:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02 14:51   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 14:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-02 14:48   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-02 14:56   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02 15:40     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-02-02 14:54 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 15:48 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6cc48ce0-96d0-4ac4-bd5d-d0ebf7325f01@redhat.com \
    --to=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).