From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDnyI-0002JQ-6P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2018 05:22:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDnyE-0005S2-W3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2018 05:22:46 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:38642 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDnyE-0005Rg-Pt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2018 05:22:42 -0400 References: <20180430103312.GH3249@redhat.com> <20180430132107.0a37704d.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180502093326.2fbec55f.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180502075904.GF3308@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <6ccd2677-0401-16c6-5431-29bc79b5ac1a@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 11:22:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] release retrospective, next release timing, numbering List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Liviu Ionescu , "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P._Berrang=c3=a9?=" Cc: QEMU Developers , Peter Maydell , Stefan Hajnoczi , Cornelia Huck On 02.05.2018 11:03, Liviu Ionescu wrote: > On 2 May 2018 at 11:13:49, Thomas Huth (thuth@redhat.com) wrote: >=20 >> https://qemu.weilnetz.de/doc/qemu-doc.html#Deprecated-features >=20 > Thank you, Thomas. >=20 >> It took quite a while to get a consensus on that policy, so I don't >> think that we want to sacrifice that for semver. >=20 > ok, this might be a point. >=20 > thinking twice, I'm not sure it is a real sacrifice; I think that the > problem here is the strict definition: >=20 > "The feature will remain functional for 2 releases prior to actual remo= val." >=20 > if it were: >=20 > "The feature will remain functional for _at least_ 2 releases prior to > actual removal.=C2=A0" >=20 > or even better: >=20 > "The feature will remain functional for _at least_ 2 _major_ releases > prior to actual removal. " Sorry, but this really does not match with what we discussed last year (see the thread at https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg01592.html for example), so I doubt that we can get a consensus on this for QEMU. Thomas