From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dueoQ-0000Lz-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:13:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dueoI-0007qA-3k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:13:10 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]:57175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dueoH-0007pq-W9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:13:02 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b184so2430340oii.13 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:13:01 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170919211012.13507-1-laurent@vivier.eu> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <6d132bf1-a651-3210-c475-850441e16cc0@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:12:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] softfloat: rename make_float[x80|128]_init to const_float[x80|128] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Laurent Vivier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Aurelien Jarno , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Peter Maydell On 09/19/2017 04:18 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/19/2017 04:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> We already have const_float16(), const_float32() and const_float64(), >> so rename make_floatx80_init() and make_float128_init() as > > s/as/to now be/ > >> const_floatx80() and const_float128(). > > s/\./, for consistency./ > >> >> Redefine make_float16(), make_float32() and make_float64() as > > s/as/to be like/ > >> make_floatx80() and make_float128() using a cast. > > s/ using a cast/, by using a compound literal/ I was about to make the same quibble. > I almost wonder if splitting this patch into two parts makes more sense > (one for the renaming of make_float[x80,128]_init, the other for the > rewriting of make_float[16,32,64] from gcc extension to compound literal). I think the patch is fine as-is. Fix the patch description and I'll give it Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~