From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890ACC18E5B for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DCE24677 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UI4x/W8i" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 57DCE24677 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58288 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBd61-0007qe-It for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:30:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBd5F-0007OO-4L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:30:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBd5E-0005pn-1U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:30:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:23601 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBd5D-0005kz-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:29:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583839799; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D9PhCD2vPwq9NRyj2C1llpqbUakIYIcCDGN6vcvjYAI=; b=UI4x/W8i0Zre0eR3xjHxKWS6eEiMbas3PqmxybOFu3N6QWhVY1Em7eFRcxtIGVosPWCInf t7DxbdDFnz9MRL7c2/c9iwLf0fzvAV389vtimeOBbh4zK/2llykb+sTw5EztSuFQAI6yPT BfSFMShSxEg8rrUc/t05h0qnIDlSwEs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-423-v3d_g3YWOiavnPewOtQc0Q-1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:29:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: v3d_g3YWOiavnPewOtQc0Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D3D1922960; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.3.116.177] (ovpn-116-177.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.177]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C247860BF3; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target. To: Yoshinori Sato References: <20200308130637.37651-1-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-ID: <6d90fc45-6d99-af60-bca0-0a84b91d0408@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:29:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 3/9/20 11:28 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >>> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst >>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents: >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 target-arm >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 target-m68k >>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 target-xtensa >>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0 target-rx >> >> Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted? >=20 > It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better= =20 > to arrange in alphabetical order? The 3 lines of context was alphabetical, but looking at the whole file,=20 the overall list is not. So sticking yours last is fine after all. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org