From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gByrk-0004Q2-In for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:08:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gByrf-0002E2-Ko for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:08:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:36955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gByrZ-000294-5j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:08:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id y11-v6so20338517wrd.4 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Jerome Forissier References: <20181005080729.6480-1-jerome.forissier@linaro.org> Message-ID: <70f911cb-7d49-e8cb-e3cd-081033e010c2@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:08:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: add DT property /secure-chosen/sdtout-path being secure UART List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , Etienne Carriere , tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, Rob Herring Hi Peter, On 10/05/2018 11:26 AM, Jerome Forissier wrote: > +CC: Rob Herring > > On 10/05/2018 11:16 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 5 October 2018 at 09:07, Jerome Forissier >> wrote: >>> Bindings for /secure-chosen and /secure-chosen/stdout-path have been >>> proposed 1.5 years ago [1] and implemented in OP-TEE at the same time [2]. >>> >>> This patch creates the property when the machine is secure. >>> >>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9602401/ >>> [2] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/commit/4dc31c52544a >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier >> >> The patch seems OK, but it looks like the DT bindings are >> not upstream yet? [*] > > No, they're not. Update: Rob has now accepted the bindings [3] (thanks!). [3] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/980467/#2009642 -- Jerome > > I wouldn't want QEMU to start creating >> bindings until the spec is definitely final. > > I understand, but I think we may have a chicken-and-egg problem, because > Rob said he'd like to see more usage of DT in secure world before > merging the bindings ;-) > > That being said, I can certainly re-submit the binding to the LKML. Rob, > what do you say? > >> >> [*] they're not in >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/secure.txt >> anyway; is that the wrong place to look? >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >> > > Thanks, >