From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cop9t-0003oF-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:30:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cop9p-0001WV-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:30:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cop9o-0001Va-S0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:30:52 -0400 References: <20170316154643.GT15193@redhat.com> <0f504dd2-235b-7ada-98b2-e0ccbd376fa7@redhat.com> <7e86352b-add7-7b73-4e6b-08016b3e7a5d@redhat.com> <20170317101257.GB8050@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <73b74fc6-033d-de06-5e00-50868f6862a6@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:30:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposal for deprecating unsupported host OSes & architecutures List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , Sean Bruno On 17.03.2017 11:15, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 March 2017 at 10:12, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> In the mail thread two months back Sean Bruno did suggest he might like >> to just start over with bsd-user: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-01/msg00171.html >> >> So perhaps someone should just ping him to see if he objects to us >> deleting bsd-usr now (on off chance he's got patches nearly ready to >> fix it) > > It's because Sean is (on-and-off) still around that I'm not > very inclined to delete bsd-user. We actually have somebody > who cares about the code, which means we should move it into > tier 1, not dump it into tier 3 and delete. OK, fair, but even Sean was suggesting to purge the old code first ... so maybe we should just do so and start with a new bsd-user folder when he is ready? Thomas